Why Medicine Often Has Dangerous Side Effects for Women Alyson McGregor TED Talks

We all go to doctors.

And we do so with trust and blind faith

that the test they are ordering
and the medications they’re prescribing

are based upon evidence –

evidence that’s designed to help us.

However, the reality is that that hasn’t
always been the case for everyone.

What if I told you

that the medical science discovered
over the past century

has been based on only
half the population?

I’m an emergency medicine doctor.

I was trained to be prepared
in a medical emergency.

It’s about saving lives. How cool is that?

OK, there’s a lot of runny noses
and stubbed toes,

but no matter who walks
through the door to the ER,

we order the same tests,

we prescribe the same medication,

without ever thinking about the sex
or gender of our patients.

Why would we?

We were never taught that there were
any differences between men and women.

A recent Government Accountability study
revealed that 80 percent of the drugs

withdrawn from the market

are due to side effects on women.

So let’s think about that for a minute.

Why are we discovering
side effects on women

only after a drug has been
released to the market?

Do you know that it takes years
for a drug to go from an idea

to being tested on cells in a laboratory,

to animal studies,

to then clinical trials on humans,

finally to go through
a regulatory approval process,

to be available for your doctor
to prescribe to you?

Not to mention the millions and billions
of dollars of funding

it takes to go through that process.

So why are we discovering
unacceptable side effects

on half the population
after that has gone through?

What’s happening?

Well, it turns out that those cells
used in that laboratory,

they’re male cells,

and the animals used
in the animal studies were male animals,

and the clinical trials have been
performed almost exclusively on men.

How is it that the male model became
our framework for medical research?

Let’s look at an example that has been
popularized in the media,

and it has to do
with the sleep aid Ambien.

Ambien was released on the market
over 20 years ago,

and since then, hundreds of millions
of prescriptions have been written,

primarily to women, because women
suffer more sleep disorders than men.

But just this past year,

the Food and Drug Administration
recommended cutting the dose in half

for women only,

because they just realized
that women metabolize the drug

at a slower rate than men,

causing them to wake up in the morning

with more of the active drug
in their system.

And then they’re drowsy and they’re
getting behind the wheel of the car,

and they’re at risk
for motor vehicle accidents.

And I can’t help but think,
as an emergency physician,

how many of my patients
that I’ve cared for over the years

were involved in a motor vehicle accident

that possibly could have been prevented

if this type of analysis was performed
and acted upon 20 years ago

when this drug was first released.

How many other things need
to be analyzed by gender?

What else are we missing?

World War II changed a lot of things,

and one of them was this need
to protect people

from becoming victims of medical research
without informed consent.

So some much-needed guidelines
or rules were set into place,

and part of that was this desire
to protect women of childbearing age

from entering into any
medical research studies.

There was fear: what if something
happened to the fetus during the study?

Who would be responsible?

And so the scientists
at this time actually thought

this was a blessing in disguise,

because let’s face it – men’s bodies
are pretty homogeneous.

They don’t have the constantly
fluctuating levels of hormones

that could disrupt clean data
they could get if they had only men.

It was easier. It was cheaper.

Not to mention, at this time,
there was a general assumption

that men and women
were alike in every way,

apart from their reproductive organs
and sex hormones.

So it was decided:

medical research was performed on men,

and the results were later
applied to women.

What did this do to the notion
of women’s health?

Women’s health became synonymous
with reproduction:

breasts, ovaries, uterus, pregnancy.

It’s this term we now refer
to as “bikini medicine.”

And this stayed this way
until about the 1980s,

when this concept was challenged
by the medical community

and by the public health policymakers
when they realized that

by excluding women
from all medical research studies

we actually did them a disservice,

in that apart from reproductive issues,

virtually nothing was known
about the unique needs

of the female patient.

Since that time, an overwhelming amount
of evidence has come to light

that shows us just how different
men and women are in every way.

You know, we have this saying in medicine:

children are not just little adults.

And we say that to remind ourselves

that children actually have
a different physiology than normal adults.

And it’s because of this that the medical
specialty of pediatrics came to light.

And we now conduct research on children
in order to improve their lives.

And I know the same thing
can be said about women.

Women are not just men
with boobs and tubes.

But they have their own
anatomy and physiology

that deserves to be studied
with the same intensity.

Let’s take the cardiovascular
system, for example.

This area in medicine has done the most
to try to figure out

why it seems men and women have
completely different heart attacks.

Heart disease is the number one killer
for both men and women,

but more women die within the first year
of having a heart attack than men.

Men will complain
of crushing chest pain –

an elephant is sitting on their chest.

And we call this typical.

Women have chest pain, too.

But more women than men
will complain of “just not feeling right,”

“can’t seem to get enough air in,”

“just so tired lately.”

And for some reason we call this atypical,

even though, as I mentioned,
women do make up half the population.

And so what is some of the evidence
to help explain some of these differences?

If we look at the anatomy,

the blood vessels that surround the heart
are smaller in women compared to men,

and the way that those blood vessels
develop disease is different

in women compared to men.

And the test that we use to determine
if someone is at risk for a heart attack,

well, they were initially designed
and tested and perfected in men,

and so aren’t as good
at determining that in women.

And then if we think
about the medications –

common medications
that we use, like aspirin.

We give aspirin to healthy men to help
prevent them from having a heart attack,

but do you know that if you
give aspirin to a healthy woman,

it’s actually harmful?

What this is doing is merely telling us

that we are scratching the surface.

Emergency medicine
is a fast-paced business.

In how many life-saving areas of medicine,

like cancer and stroke,

are there important differences between
men and women that we could be utilizing?

Or even, why is it that some people
get those runny noses

more than others,

or why the pain medication that we give
to those stubbed toes

work in some and not in others?

The Institute of Medicine has said
every cell has a sex.

What does this mean?

Sex is DNA.

Gender is how someone
presents themselves in society.

And these two may not always match up,

as we can see with our
transgendered population.

But it’s important to realize
that from the moment of conception,

every cell in our bodies –

skin, hair, heart and lungs –

contains our own unique DNA,

and that DNA contains
the chromosomes that determine

whether we become
male or female, man or woman.

It used to be thought

that those sex-determining
chromosomes pictured here –

XY if you’re male, XX if you’re female –

merely determined whether you
would be born with ovaries or testes,

and it was the sex hormones
that those organs produced

that were responsible for the differences
we see in the opposite sex.

But we now know that
that theory was wrong –

or it’s at least a little incomplete.

And thankfully, scientists like Dr. Page
from the Whitehead Institute,

who works on the Y chromosome,

and Doctor Yang from UCLA,

they have found evidence that tells us
that those sex-determining chromosomes

that are in every cell in our bodies

continue to remain active
for our entire lives

and could be what’s responsible
for the differences we see

in the dosing of drugs,

or why there are differences
between men and women

in the susceptibility
and severity of diseases.

This new knowledge is the game-changer,

and it’s up to those scientists
that continue to find that evidence,

but it’s up to the clinicians
to start translating this data

at the bedside, today.

Right now.

And to help do this, I’m a co-founder
of a national organization

called Sex and Gender
Women’s Health Collaborative,

and we collect all of this data
so that it’s available for teaching

and for patient care.

And we’re working to bring together
the medical educators to the table.

That’s a big job.

It’s changing the way medical training
has been done since its inception.

But I believe in them.

I know they’re going to see the value
of incorporating the gender lens

into the current curriculum.

It’s about training the future
health care providers correctly.

And regionally,

I’m a co-creator of a division within
the Department of Emergency Medicine

here at Brown University,

called Sex and Gender
in Emergency Medicine,

and we conduct the research to determine
the differences between men and women

in emergent conditions,

like heart disease and stroke
and sepsis and substance abuse,

but we also believe
that education is paramount.

We’ve created a 360-degree
model of education.

We have programs for the doctors,
for the nurses, for the students

and for the patients.

Because this cannot just be left up
to the health care leaders.

We all have a role in making a difference.

But I must warn you: this is not easy.

In fact, it’s hard.

It’s essentially changing the way
we think about medicine

and health and research.

It’s changing our relationship
to the health care system.

But there’s no going back.

We now know just enough

to know that we weren’t doing it right.

Martin Luther King, Jr. has said,

“Change does not roll in
on the wheels of inevitability,

but comes through continuous struggle.”

And the first step
towards change is awareness.

This is not just about improving
medical care for women.

This is about personalized,
individualized health care for everyone.

This awareness has the power to transform
medical care for men and women.

And from now on, I want you
to ask your doctors

whether the treatments you are receiving
are specific to your sex and gender.

They may not know the answer –

yet.

But the conversation has begun,
and together we can all learn.

Remember, for me
and my colleagues in this field,

your sex and gender matter.

Thank you.

(Applause)

我们都去看医生。

我们以信任和盲目的信念这样做

,他们订购的测试
和他们开出的药物

是基于证据的——

旨在帮助我们的证据。

然而,现实情况是,并非
所有人都如此。

如果我告诉你

,上个世纪发现的医学科学

只基于
一半人口呢?

我是一名急诊医生。

我受过训练,可以
为医疗紧急情况做好准备。

这是关于拯救生命。 多么酷啊?

好吧,有很多流鼻涕
和脚趾头,

但无论谁
走进急诊室,

我们都会进行相同的检查

,开出相同的药物,

而不会考虑患者的性别
或性别。

我们为什么要?

我们从来没有被教导过
男女之间有任何差异。

最近的一项政府问责制研究
显示,从市场上撤出的药物中有 80%

是由于对女性的副作用。

所以让我们考虑一下。

为什么我们只有在药物上市后才发现
对女性的副作用

你知道吗
,一种药物从一个想法

到在实验室的细胞上进行测试,

再到动物研究,

再到人体临床试验,

最后
通过监管审批程序

,供你的医生使用,需要数年时间
给你开处方?

更不用说完成这一过程所需的数百万和数
十亿美元的资金

了。

那么,为什么我们

在经历了半数人口
之后发现了不可接受的副作用呢?

发生了什么?

嗯,事实证明,
那个实验室使用的那些细胞,

它们是雄性细胞,


动物研究中使用的动物是雄性动物

,临床试验
几乎完全是在男性身上进行的。

男性模型是如何成为
我们医学研究的框架的?

让我们看一个
在媒体上流行的例子

,它
与安眠药有关。

Ambien
于 20 多年前投放市场,

从那时起,已开出数以亿计
的处方,

主要针对女性,因为女性
比男性遭受更多的睡眠障碍。

但就在去年,

美国食品和药物管理局
建议

仅将女性的剂量减半,

因为他们刚刚
意识到女性代谢药物

的速度比男性慢,

导致她们早上醒来时会摄入

更多的活性物质
他们系统中的药物。

然后他们昏昏欲睡,他们坐在
汽车的方向盘后面

,他们有发生
机动车事故的风险。

而且我不禁想到,
作为一名急诊医师,

我多年来照顾的患者中有多少

卷入了机动车事故

如果进行这种类型的分析
并采取行动,这些事故可能是可以避免的 20 年前,

当这种药物首次发布时。

还有多少其他事情需要
按性别来分析?

我们还缺少什么?

第二次世界大战改变了很多事情,

其中之一就是
需要保护人们


未经知情同意的情况下成为医学研究的受害者。

因此,制定了一些急需的指导方针
或规则,

其中部分原因是
希望保护育龄妇女

不参与任何
医学研究。

有一种恐惧:万一
在研究过程中胎儿出事了怎么办?

谁来负责?

所以当时的科学家
们实际上认为

这是因祸得福,

因为让我们面对现实吧——男人的身体
是相当同质的。

他们没有不断
波动的荷尔蒙水平,

如果只有男性,他们可能会破坏他们可以获得的干净数据。

这更容易。 它更便宜。

更不用说,当时
人们普遍

认为,除了生殖器官和性激素之外,男人和女人
在其他方面都是相似的

所以决定:

对男性进行医学研究,

然后将结果
应用于女性。


对女性健康的概念有什么影响?

女性的健康成为
生殖的代名词:

乳房、卵巢、子宫、怀孕。

我们现在将这个
术语称为“比基尼医学”。

这种情况
一直持续到 1980 年代左右,

当时这一概念
受到医学界

和公共卫生政策制定者的挑战,
当时他们意识到

,将女性
排除在所有医学研究之外

,实际上对她们造成了伤害

,因为除了生殖问题 ,

几乎对女性患者
的独特需求一无所知

从那时起,
大量证据浮出水面

,向我们展示了
男性和女性在各方面的差异。

你知道,我们在医学上有这样一句话:

孩子不仅仅是小大人。

我们这样说是为了提醒自己

,儿童实际上
具有与正常成年人不同的生理机能。

也正因为如此,儿科的医学
专业才被曝光。

我们现在对儿童进行研究,
以改善他们的生活。

我知道
对于女性也可以这样说。

女人不仅仅是
有胸部和管子的男人。

但它们有自己的
解剖学和生理学

,值得
以同样的强度进行研究。

让我们以心血管
系统为例。

这个医学领域在
试图弄清楚

为什么男性和女性的
心脏病发作似乎完全不同方面做得最多。

心脏病
是男性和女性的头号杀手,

但在心脏病发作的第一年内死亡的女性
比男性多。

男人会
抱怨胸口剧烈疼痛——

一头大象正坐在他们的胸前。

我们称之为典型。

女性也有胸痛。

但女性多于男性
会抱怨“感觉不对劲”

、“似乎无法呼吸到足够的空气”、

“最近太累了”。

出于某种原因,我们称之为非典型,

尽管正如我所提到的,
女性确实占人口的一半。

那么,有哪些证据
可以帮助解释其中的一些差异呢?

如果我们从解剖学上看,女性

心脏周围的血管
比男性要小,而女性与男性相比

,这些血管
发生疾病的方式也

不同。

我们用来
确定某人是否有心脏病发作风险的测试,

嗯,它们最初是
在男性身上设计、测试和完善的,

因此
在确定女性身上并不那么好。

然后如果我们
考虑药物——

我们使用的常见药物,比如阿司匹林。

我们给健康男性服用阿司匹林以帮助
他们预防心脏病发作,

但你知道如果你
给健康女性服用阿司匹林,

它实际上是有害的吗?

这只是告诉我们

,我们只是在摸索表面。

急诊医学
是一项快节奏的业务。

在癌症和中风等医学的多少挽救生命的领域中

,我们可以利用男性和女性之间的重要差异吗?

甚至,为什么有些人

比其他人更容易流鼻涕,

或者为什么我们给那些脚趾受伤的止痛药

对一些人有效,而对另一些人无效?

医学研究所说
每个细胞都有性别。

这是什么意思?

性是DNA。

性别是一个
人在社会中展现自己的方式。

正如我们在跨性别人群中看到的那样,这两者可能并不总是匹配

但重要的是要意识到
,从受孕的那一刻起,

我们身体的每一个细胞——

皮肤、头发、心脏和肺——都

包含我们自己独特的 DNA,

而 DNA 包含

决定我们成为
男性还是女性的染色体,伙计 或女人。

过去人们

认为,图中的那些决定性别的
染色体——

如果你是男性,则为 XY,如果你是女性,则为

XX——仅仅决定了你
是否会生下卵巢或睾丸,


那些 产生的器官

是造成
我们在异性中看到的差异的原因。

但我们现在知道
那个理论是错误的——

或者至少有点不完整。

值得庆幸的是,像
怀特黑德研究所的佩奇

博士和加州大学洛杉矶分校的杨博士这样的科学家,

他们发现了证据告诉我们

我们身体每个细胞中的那些决定性别的染色体

继续存在 活跃
在我们的整个生命中

,这可能是
导致我们在药物剂量方面看到的差异的原因

或者是为什么
男性和女性之间

在疾病的易感性
和严重性方面存在差异的原因。

这种新知识改变了游戏规则

,这取决于
那些继续寻找证据的科学家,

但今天就需要临床医生在床边
开始翻译这些数据

现在。

为了帮助做到这一点,我是一个

名为 Sex and Gender
Women’s Health Collaborative 的全国性组织的联合创始人

,我们收集所有这些数据,
以便将其用于教学

和患者护理。

我们正在努力将
医学教育工作者召集到一起。

这是一项大工作。 自成立以来,

它正在改变医学培训的方式

但我相信他们。

我知道他们会看到
将性别视角

纳入当前课程的价值。

这是关于正确培训未来的
医疗保健提供者。

在区域上,

我是布朗大学急诊医学系的一个部门的共同创建者

称为
急诊医学中的性别

和性别,我们进行研究以确定紧急情况下
男性和女性之间的差异

比如 心脏病、中风
、败血症和药物滥用,

但我们也
相信教育是最重要的。

我们创建了一个 360 度全方位
的教育模式。

我们有针对医生
、护士、学生

和患者的计划。

因为这不能只
留给医疗保健领导人。

我们都在发挥作用。

但我必须警告你:这并不容易。

事实上,这很难。

它从根本上改变了
我们对医学

、健康和研究的看法。

它正在改变我们
与医疗保健系统的关系。

但是没有回头路了。

我们现在知道的

足以知道我们做得不对。

Martin Luther King, Jr. 曾说过:

“改变不是
在必然的轮子上滚来滚去,

而是通过不断的斗争来实现的。”

改变的第一步是意识。

这不仅仅是为了
改善女性的医疗保健。

这是关于
为每个人提供个性化、个性化的医疗保健。

这种意识有能力改变
男性和女性的医疗保健。

从现在开始,我希望
您询问您的医生

您正在接受的治疗
是否针对您的性别和性别。

他们可能还不知道答案

但是对话已经开始
,我们可以一起学习。

请记住,对于我
和我在这个领域的同事来说,

你的性别和性别很重要。

谢谢你。

(掌声)