How to get a word added to the dictionary Ilan Stavans

“Dictionary:” noun,
“a malevolent literary device

for cramping the growth of a language
and making it hard and inelastic.”

“Lexicographer:” noun, “a writer
of dictionaries; a harmless drudge.”

While the concept of a dictionary
dates back to ancient civilizations,

the first English dictionary was published
by Robert Cawdrey in 1604.

In the centuries that followed,

many more dictionaries were written
by individual authors

who chose what to include or exclude.

They not only defined words, they openly
showcased their creators’ opinions—

like Ambrose Bierce’s definition
of “dictionary”

and Samuel Johnson’s definition
of “lexicographer.”

After their authors deaths, many of these
dictionaries quickly became outdated.

But one 19th century dictionary
had a different fate.

In 1828, American lawyer and author
Noah Webster published

“An American Dictionary of the
English Language” with a lofty goal:

to give the United States its own version
of the English language.

He believed that as a new nation,

the United States needed its own distinct
version of English

to assert its independence from Britain.

In his dictionary, Webster sought
to describe and officialize

the way Americans spoke.

Most dictionaries in Webster’s time
were prescriptive:

they dictated how words should be used,

rather than documenting the way people
actually used language in daily life.

When Webster broke this convention and
included slang words in his dictionary,

critics accused him of polluting
the English language.

But he argued that these words captured
local variations of language—

a vital part of what made
American English unique.

He also believed spelling rules
were unnecessarily complex,

and that we should write the way
we speak as much as possible.

Still, Webster’s own opinions influenced
the words he included

and the way he defined them.

He excluded slang words
from Black communities

because he didn’t consider them proper.

And when he defined “woman,”

he added that “women are soft,
mild, pitiful, and flexible.”

By the time of his death,
Noah Webster was a household name.

Seeing a lucrative business opportunity,

brothers George and Charles Merriam bought
the rights to Webster’s Dictionary.

Together with Webster’s son-in-law,
the Merriams made a new, revised edition.

It was the beginning
of the Merriam-Webster Dictionary.

Today, the Merriam-Webster Dictionary
begins to address

a contradiction in Webster’s goal:

he wanted to represent an entire nation,

but he based his work on just one person’s
opinion: his own.

Since Webster’s death, each new edition
of the dictionary has been curated

by a group of language experts rather
than by a single authority.

The current criteria for
including a word in the dictionary

are that it has “widespread,
sustained, and meaningful use.”

This clearly includes profanities,

which were sometimes excluded
from dictionaries in the past.

Racial slurs also meet
the criteria for inclusion,

but some argue that including
them might legitimize them.

Dictionaries don’t just add new words—

they also redefine old words to reflect
changing attitudes and usage.

One 1736 dictionary defined “wife”
as “a married woman whose will,

in the judgment of the law, is subject
to the will of her husband:

for which reason a wife is
said to have no will.”

Today, “wife” is defined simply as
“a female partner in a marriage.”

In 2019, Merriam-Webster’s word
of the year was “they.”

The word has been in regular
use for centuries,

but has only recently gained a new
recognized meaning,

as a pronoun for one person whose
gender identity is nonbinary.

The question of which words belong
in the dictionary impacts all of us—

when our words and definitions
are represented, they’re affirmed;

if not, they— and we— are minimized.

Today, lexicographers have expanded
word sourcing

to include the dictionary’s users:
tracking which words are most searched,

and adding them to the dictionary.

So, who decides what’s in the dictionary?

More than ever before the answer is:
we do.

All of us shape language every day.

When we collectively embrace one word
or redefine another,

eventually, those words and meanings
are reflected in our dictionaries.

“字典:”名词,
“一种恶意的文学工具,

用于限制语言的发展
,使其变得僵硬和缺乏弹性。”

“词典编纂者:”名词,“
词典作者; 一种无害的苦力。”

虽然字典的概念
可以追溯到古代文明

,但第一部英文字典是
由罗伯特·考德瑞于 1604

年出版的。在随后的几个世纪中,

更多的字典是由

选择包含或排除什么的个人作者编写的。

他们不仅定义了单词,还公开
展示了创作者的观点——

比如 Ambrose Bierce
对“字典”

的定义和 Samuel Johnson
对“词典编纂者”的定义。

在其作者去世后,其中许多
词典很快就过时了。

但是一本 19 世纪的字典
却有不同的命运。

1828 年,美国律师和作家
诺亚韦伯斯特出版了

《美国
英语词典》,其目标远大

:让美国拥有自己
的英语版本。

他认为,作为一个新国家

,美国需要自己独特
的英语版本

来宣称其独立于英国。

在他的字典中,韦伯斯特
试图描述和官方化

美国人说话的方式。

韦伯斯特时代的大多数字典
都是规定性的:

它们规定了应该如何使用单词,

而不是记录人们
在日常生活中实际使用语言的方式。

当韦伯斯特打破这个惯例,
在他的字典中加入俚语时,

批评者指责他污染
了英语。

但他认为,这些词捕捉到了
当地语言

的变化——这是美式英语独一无二的重要组成部分

他还认为拼写
规则过于复杂

,我们应该
尽可能地按照我们说话的方式书写。

尽管如此,韦伯斯特自己的观点影响
了他所包含的词语

以及他定义它们的方式。

他将俚语
排除在黑人社区之外,

因为他认为它们不合适。

当他定义“女人”时,

他补充说“女人是柔软、
温和、可怜和灵活的。”

到他去世时,
诺亚韦伯斯特是家喻户晓的名字。 George 和 Charles Merriam 兄弟

看到了有利可图的商机,

购买
了韦氏词典的版权。

Merriams 与韦伯斯特的女婿
一起制作了一个新的修订版。


是韦氏词典的开端。

今天,韦氏词典
开始解决

韦氏目标中的一个矛盾:

他想代表整个国家,

但他的工作只基于一个人的
观点:他自己的观点。

自韦伯斯特去世
以来,该词典的每个新版本

都由一组语言专家而
不是由一个权威机构策划。

目前
在字典中包含一个词的标准

是它具有“广泛、
持续和有意义的用途”。

这显然包括亵渎,

过去有时
从字典中排除。

种族诽谤也
符合纳入标准,

但有些人认为,
将它们包括在内可能会使它们合法化。

字典不只是添加新

词——它们还重新定义旧词以反映
不断变化的态度和用法。

一部 1736 年的字典将“妻子”定义
为“已婚妇女

,根据法律的判断,其意志
服从丈夫的意志

:因此据说妻子
没有意志。”

今天,“妻子”被简单地定义为
“婚姻中的女性伴侣”。

2019 年,韦氏词典
的年度词汇是“他们”。

这个词已经
使用了几个世纪,

但直到最近才获得了新的
公认含义,

作为一个人的代名词,其
性别认同是非二元的。

哪些词
属于字典的问题影响着我们所有人——

当我们的词和定义
被表示时,它们就被肯定了;

如果没有,他们——以及我们——将被最小化。

今天,词典编纂者已经扩展了
词源

以包括词典的用户:
跟踪搜索最多的词,

并将它们添加到词典中。

那么,谁来决定字典里的内容呢?

答案比以往任何时候都多:
我们愿意。

我们所有人每天都在塑造语言。

当我们集体接受一个词
或重新定义另一个词时,

最终,这些词和含义
会反映在我们的字典中。