A path to security for the worlds deadliest countries Rachel Kleinfeld

Picture your dream vacation.

Maybe you’re dying to go
to Rio for Carnival.

Or you really just want to hang out
on a Mexican beach.

Or maybe you’re going to join me
in New Orleans for Jazz Fest.

Now, I know it’s less pleasant,

but picture, for a moment,

one of the most violent places on earth.

Did anyone think of the same place?

Brazil is the most violent country
in the world today.

More people have been dying there
over the last three years

than in Syria.

And in Mexico, more people have died
over the last 15 years

than in Iraq or Afghanistan.

In New Orleans, more people
per capita are dying

than in war-torn Somalia.

The fact is, war only results

in about 18 percent
of violent deaths worldwide.

Today, you are more likely
to die violently

if you live in a middle-income democracy

with high levels of income inequality

and serious political polarization.

The United States has four
of the 50 most violent cities on earth.

Now, this is a fundamental alteration
in the nature of violence, historically.

But it’s also an opportunity.

Because while few people
can do much to end war,

violence in our democracies
is our problem.

And while regular voters
are a big part of that problem,

we’re also key to the solution.

Now, I work at a think tank,

the Carnegie Endowment
for International Peace,

where I advise governments
on what to do about violence,

but the dirty secret is,

most policymakers haven’t figured out
these changes to violence today.

They still believe that the worst violence
happens in countries at war

or places that are too poor, too weak,

to fight violence and control crime.

And that had been my assumption too.

But if you look at a map
of the most violent places on earth,

you see something strange.

Some of them are at war,

and a few are truly failed states.

The violence in these places is horrific,

but they happen to have small populations,

so it actually affects few people.

Then there’s South Africa,
Brazil, Venezuela.

These places are not poor.

Maybe they’re weak.

My research assistant and I mapped places

based on how well they delivered
on World Bank projects

and whether they could get
public services to their people,

and if you did well on both of those,

if you could get sanitation
and electricity to your people

and deliver vaccines,

you were in the upper right-hand quadrant.

And then we overlaid that

with a map of places
where journalists were being murdered.

Some were happening in weak states,

but an awful lot of journalists
were being killed

in places plenty capable
of protecting them.

I traveled to every
settled continent on earth,

comparing places that had faced
massive violence and recovered

and those that hadn’t,

and I kept seeing the same pattern.

I came to call it “privilege violence,”

because it happened
in highly unequal democracies,

where a small group of people

wanted to hold on
to inordinate power and privilege.

And if they didn’t think they could
get those policies past the voters,

sometimes they would turn
to violent groups for help.

Drug cartels would finance
their campaigns.

Organized criminals
would help them get out the vote.

Gangs would suppress the vote.

And in exchange,
they’d be given free reign,

and violence would grow.

Take Venezuela.

It’s the most violent country
in the world today,

if you look at deaths per capita.

Twenty years ago, the current regime
gained power in legitimate elections,

but they didn’t want to risk losing it,

and so they turned to gangs,
called “colectivos,” for help.

The gangs were told
to get out the vote for the government

and force people to vote for the regime
in some neighborhoods

and keep opposition voters
away from the polls in others,

and, in exchange, they’d be given control.

But if criminals have control,

then police and courts
can’t do their jobs.

So the second stage in privilege violence

is that courts and police are weakened,

and politicians politicize budgets,

hiring, firing,

so that they and the violent groups
that they collude with stay out of jail.

Now, pretty soon, good cops leave,

and many that remain become brutal.

They start off, usually,
with rough justice.

They kill a drug dealer that they think
would be let off by the corrupt courts.

But over time, the worst of them realize
that there will be no repercussions

from the politicians they’re in bed with,

and they go into business for themselves.

In Venezuela, nearly one in three murders
is by the security services.

Now, the poor are hit hardest
by violence all over the world,

but they’re hardly going to turn
to such predatory cops for help.

So they tend to form vigilante groups.

But arm a bunch of 18-year-old boys,

and pretty soon, they devolve
into gangs over time.

Other gangs come in, mafias come in,

and they offer to protect people
from the other criminals

and from the police.

Unlike the state,

the criminals often try to buy legitimacy.

They give charity. They solve disputes.

Sometimes, they even
build subsidized housing.

The last stage of privilege violence
happens when regular people

start committing a significant
portion of the murder.

Bar fights and neighborhood
arguments turn deadly

when violence has become normal

and repercussions have evaporated.

To outsiders, the culture looks depraved,

as if something is deeply wrong
with those people.

But any country can become this violent

when the government is, by turns,
absent and predatory.

Actually, that’s not quite true –

it takes one more step
for this level of violence to reign.

It takes mainstream society

to ignore the problem.

You’d think that would be impossible,

that violence at this level
would be unbearable,

but it’s actually quite bearable
to people like you and me.

That’s because,
in every society in the world,

even the most violent,

violence is highly concentrated.

It happens to people
on the wrong side of town,

people who are poor, often darker,

often from groups that are marginalized,

groups that mainstream society
can separate ourselves from.

Violence is so concentrated

that we’re shocked
when the pattern deviates.

In Washington, DC, in 2001,

a young white college-educated intern

went missing after a hike in Northwest DC,

and her case was in the papers
nearly every day.

On the other side of town,

a black man had been killed
every other day that year.

Most of those cases
never made the papers even once.

Middle class society
buys their way out of violence.

We live in better neighborhoods.

Some people buy private security.

And we also tell ourselves a story.

We tell ourselves that most
of the people who are killed

are probably involved in crime themselves.

By believing that somehow
some people deserve to be murdered,

otherwise good people
allow ourselves to live

in places where life chances
are so deeply skewed.

We allow ourselves.

Because, after all, what else can you do?

Well, it turns out, quite a lot.

Because violence today
is not largely the result of war

but is because of rotten politics
in our democracies,

regular voters are
the greatest force for change.

Consider the transformation of Bogotá.

In 1994, Colombia’s incoming president

was caught taking millions of dollars
in campaign contributions

from the Cali drug cartel,

and the capital was overrun
with gangs and paramilitary groups.

But fed-up voters overcame
really rabid partisanship,

and they delivered
nearly two-thirds of the vote

to an independent candidate,

enough to really overcome
business as usual.

On Mayor Mockus’s first day in office,

the police barely bothered
to even brief him on homicide,

and when he asked why,
they just shrugged and said,

“It’s just criminals killing criminals.”

The corrupt city council

wanted to give police
even more impunity for brutality.

It’s a really common tactic
that’s used worldwide

when politicians want to posture
as tough on crime

but don’t actually want
to change the status quo.

And research shows it backfires
all over the world.

If you throw a lot
of low-level offenders into jails,

usually already overcrowded jails,

they learn from each other
and they harden.

They start to control the prisons,
and from there, the streets.

Instead, Mockus insisted that police
begin investigating every death.

He fought the right-wing city council,

and he abandoned
SWAT-style police tactics.

And he fought the left-wing unions

and fired thousands of predatory cops.

Honest police were finally free
to do their jobs.

Mockus then challenged citizens.

He asked the middle class
to stop opting out of their city,

to follow traffic laws

and otherwise behave as if they shared
the same community of fate.

He asked the poor to uphold
social norms against violence,

often at immense personal risk.

And he asked the wealthy to give
10 percent more in taxes, voluntarily.

Sixty-three thousand people did.

And at the end of the decade that spanned
Mayor Mockus’s two terms in office,

homicide in Bogotá was down 70 percent.

Audience: Whoo!

(Applause)

People in places with the most violence,

whether it’s Colombia
or the United States,

can make the biggest difference.

The most important thing we can do
is abandon the notion

that some lives are just
worth less than others,

that someone deserves
to be raped or murdered,

because after all, they did something,

they stole or they did something
to land themselves in prison

where that kind of thing happens.

This devaluing of human life,

a devaluing we barely admit
even to ourselves,

is what allows the whole
downward spiral to begin.

It’s what allows a bullet
shot in a gang war in Rio

to lodge in the head
of a two-year-old girl

climbing on a jungle gym nearby.

And it’s what allows a SWAT team
hunting for a meth dealer in Georgia

to throw a flash bang grenade
into the crib of a little boy,

exploding near his face
and maiming him for life.

The fact is, most violence everywhere

happens to people
on the wrong side of town

at the wrong time,

and some of those people
are from communities

that we consider quite different.

Some of them are people
who have done horrible things.

But reducing violence begins
with privileging every human life,

both because it’s right

and because only by prizing each life
as worthy of at least due process,

can we create societies
in which the lives of innocents are safe.

Second, recognize that today,

inequality within our countries

is a vastly greater cause of violence
than war between countries.

Now, inequality leads to violence
for a whole host of reasons,

but one of them is that it lets us
separate ourselves

from what’s happening
on the other side of town.

Those of us who are
middle-class or wealthy,

who are benefiting from these systems,

have to change them
at immense cost to ourselves.

We have to pay enough taxes

and then demand that our governments
put good teachers in other kids' schools

and well-trained police
to protect other peoples' neighborhoods.

But, of course,
that’s not going to do any good

if the government is stealing the money
or fueling the violence,

and so we also need better politicians
with better incentives.

The fact is, we actually know a lot
about what it takes to reduce violence.

It’s policies like putting more cops

in the few places
where most violence occurs.

But they don’t fit easily into the boxes
of the Left or the Right,

and so you need really honest politicians

who are willing to buck
knee-jerk partisanship

and implement solutions.

And if we want good politicians to run,

we need to start respecting politicians.

There’s also a lot we can do to fight
privilege violence in other countries.

The most violent regimes
tend to be fueled by drugs,

and then they launder the profits
through financial systems

in New York and London,

through real-estate transactions,

and through high-end resorts.

If you use drugs,

know your supply chain top to bottom,

or admit the amount of pain
you’re willing to cause others

for your own pleasure.

Meanwhile, I would love to see
one of those tourist sites

team up with investigative journalists

and create a little tiny icon –

right next to the one for free WiFi
and if a place has a swimming pool,

there could be a little tiny gun

for “likely criminal
money-laundering front.”

(Laughter)

(Applause)

But until then,

if you’re booking a place
in a dangerous country,

whether that’s Jamaica or New Orleans,

do a little web research,

see if you can see any criminal ties.

And, to make that easier,

support legislation

that makes our financial systems
more transparent –

things like banning anonymous
company ownership.

Now, this all probably sounds
pretty quixotic,

kind of like recycling your cans,

just a tiny drop in the ocean
of a gigantic problem,

but that’s actually a misconception.

Homicide has been falling for centuries.

Battle deaths have been
dropping for decades.

In places where people
have demanded change,

violent death has fallen,
from Colombia to New York City,

where homicide is down
85 percent since 1990.

The fact is, violence
will always be with us,

but it’s not a constant.

It has been falling for centuries,
and it could fall further faster.

Could it drop by 25 percent
in the next quarter century, a third?

Many of us actually think it could.

I think of all the kids
who’d grow up with their dads,

all the families
that get their sisters back,

their brothers.

All it needs is one small push.

It needs us to care.

Thank you.

(Applause)

想象你的梦想假期。

也许你很想去
里约狂欢节。

或者你真的只是想
在墨西哥海滩上闲逛。

或者,也许你会和我一起
在新奥尔良参加爵士音乐节。

现在,我知道这不那么令人愉快了,

但是暂时想象一下,

地球上最暴力的地方之一。

有没有人想到同一个地方?

巴西是当今世界上最暴力的国家

在过去三年里,那里的死亡

人数比叙利亚还多。

在墨西哥,
过去 15 年中死亡的

人数超过了伊拉克或阿富汗。

在新奥尔良,
人均死亡

人数比饱受战争蹂躏的索马里还要多。

事实是,战争仅

导致全球大约 18%
的暴力死亡。

今天,

如果你生活在一个

收入不平等程度高

、政治两极分化严重的中等收入民主国家,你更有可能死于暴力。

美国拥有
地球上 50 个最暴力的城市中的四个。

现在,这是
历史上暴力性质的根本改变。

但这也是一个机会。

因为虽然很少有人
能为结束战争做很多事情,但

我们民主国家的暴力
是我们的问题。

虽然普通选民
是该问题的重要组成部分,

但我们也是解决方案的关键。

现在,我在智囊团工作,

卡内基国际和平基金会,

在那里我就如何应对暴力向政府提供建议

但肮脏的秘密是,

大多数政策制定者今天还没有弄清楚
暴力的这些变化。

他们仍然认为,最严重的暴力
发生在交战国家

或太穷、太弱,

无法打击暴力和控制犯罪的地方。

这也是我的假设。

但如果你看
一下地球上最暴力的地方的地图,

你会发现一些奇怪的东西。

其中一些处于战争状态,

还有一些是真正失败的国家。

这些地方的暴力是可怕的,

但他们恰好人口少,

所以它实际上影响的人很少。

然后是南非、
巴西、委内瑞拉。

这些地方并不穷。

也许他们很弱。

我和我的研究助理

根据他们
在世界银行项目中的交付情况

以及他们是否可以
为他们的人民获得公共服务

以及如果你在这两个方面都做得很好,

你是否可以
为你的人民提供卫生设施和电力

并提供 疫苗,

你在右上象限。

然后我们

用一张
记者被谋杀地点的地图覆盖了它。

有些发生在弱国,

但大量记者

在足以
保护他们的地方遇害。

我走遍了地球上每一个
定居的大陆,

比较了那些面临
大规模暴力并恢复的地方

和那些没有恢复的地方

,我一直看到同样的模式。

我开始称其为“特权暴力”,

因为它发生
在高度不平等的民主国家

,一小群人

想要
掌握过度的权力和特权。

如果他们认为他们不能
让这些政策通过选民,

有时他们会
求助于暴力团体。

贩毒集团将为
他们的竞选活动提供资金。

有组织的犯罪分子
会帮助他们赢得选票。

帮派会压制投票。

作为交换,
他们将获得自由统治权

,暴力将会增长。

以委内瑞拉为例。 如果你看人均死亡人数,

它是当今世界上最暴力的国家

二十年前,现
政权在合法选举中获得了权力,

但他们不想冒险失去权力

,所以他们求助于
被称为“colectivos”的帮派。

这些团伙被告知
要为政府投票,

并迫使人们在一些社区投票支持政权

并让反对派选民
远离其他社区的投票

,作为交换,他们将获得控制权。

但是如果犯罪分子有控制权,

那么警察和法院
就无法完成他们的工作。

所以特权暴力的第二个阶段

是法院和警察被削弱

,政客们将预算、

招聘、解雇政治化,

以便他们和
他们勾结的暴力团体免于入狱。

现在,很快,好警察离开了

,许多留下来的人变得残暴。

他们通常
以粗暴的正义开始。

他们杀死了一个毒贩,他们认为
腐败的法庭会放过他。

但随着时间的推移,他们中最糟糕的人意识到

,与他们同床共枕的政客不会对他们产生任何影响

,他们开始为自己做生意。

在委内瑞拉,近三分之一的谋杀案
是由安全部门所为。

现在,全世界的穷人受到的暴力打击最为严重

但他们几乎不会
求助于这种掠夺性的警察。

因此,他们倾向于形成自卫团体。

但是武装了一群 18 岁的男孩

,很快,
随着时间的推移,他们变成了帮派。

其他帮派进来了,黑手党进来了

,他们主动提出保护人们
免受其他罪犯

和警察的伤害。

与国家不同

,犯罪分子经常试图购买合法性。

他们给予慈善。 他们解决纠纷。

有时,他们甚至
建造补贴住房。

特权暴力的最后阶段
发生在普通人

开始犯下很大
一部分谋杀罪时。

当暴力成为常态

并且影响消失时,酒吧打架和邻里争吵变得致命。

在外人看来,这种文化看起来很堕落,

就好像那些人有什么严重的问题

但是,

当政府轮流
缺席和掠夺性时,任何国家都可能变得如此暴力。

实际上,这并不完全正确——

这种暴力程度还需要再迈出一步。

主流社会

需要忽视这个问题。

你会认为这是不可能的,

这种级别的暴力
是无法忍受的,

但实际上
对你我这样的人来说是可以忍受的。

那是因为,
在世界上的每一个社会中,

即使是最暴力的,

暴力也是高度集中的。

它发生
在城镇错误一边的

人身上,贫穷的人,通常更黑暗的人,

通常来自边缘化

群体,主流社会
可以将我们与之分开的群体。

暴力如此集中

,以至于
当模式偏离时我们会感到震惊。

2001 年,在华盛顿特区,

一名年轻的受过大学教育的白人实习生

在西北特区徒步旅行后失踪

,她的案子几乎每天都出现在报纸上

那年,在城镇的另一边,每隔一天

就有一个黑人被杀

这些案件中的大多数
甚至一次都没有上过报纸。

中产阶级社会通过
购买来摆脱暴力。

我们住在更好的社区。

有些人购买私人保安。

我们也给自己讲了一个故事。

我们告诉自己,
大多数被杀的

人可能自己也参与了犯罪活动。

通过相信
某些人应该以某种方式被谋杀,

否则好人
会让自己生活

在生活
机会如此严重倾斜的地方。

我们允许自己。

因为,毕竟,你还能做什么?

好吧,事实证明,相当多。

因为今天的暴力
主要不是战争的结果,

而是因为
我们民主国家的腐败政治,

普通选民
是变革的最大力量。

考虑波哥大的转型。

1994 年,哥伦比亚即将上任的总统

被抓获从卡利贩毒集团拿走数百万美元
的竞选捐款

,首都被
帮派和准军事团体占领。

但受够了的选民克服了
真正狂热的党派偏见

,他们
将近三分之二的选票投

给了独立候选人,

足以真正克服
一切照旧。

莫库斯市长上任的第一天

,警察
甚至懒得向他介绍他的凶杀案

,当他问为什么时,
他们只是耸了耸肩说:

“这只是罪犯杀害罪犯。”

腐败的市议会

想让警察
的暴行更加不受惩罚。

当政客想要
对犯罪采取强硬态度

但实际上并不
想改变现状时,这是一种非常普遍的策略,在全球范围内使用。

研究表明,它
在全世界适得其反。

如果你把
很多低级罪犯扔进监狱,

通常监狱已经人满为患,

他们会互相学习,
变得更加坚强。

他们开始控制监狱,
并从那里控制街道。

相反,莫库斯坚持要求警方
开始调查每一起死亡事件。

他与右翼市议会作斗争,

并放弃了
特警式的警察战术。

他与左翼工会作战

,解雇了数千名掠夺性警察。

诚实的警察终于可以自由
地做他们的工作了。

莫库斯随后向市民发起挑战。

他要求
中产阶级停止选择离开他们的城市

,遵守交通法规

,否则就表现得好像他们
拥有同一个命运共同体。

他要求穷人坚持
反对暴力的社会规范,这

往往会冒着巨大的个人风险。

他要求富人
自愿多交10%的税。

六万三千人做到了。

在莫库斯市长两届任期的十年末,

波哥大的凶杀案下降了 70%。

观众:哇!

(掌声

) 在暴力最严重的地方,

无论是哥伦比亚
还是美国,

都能发挥最大的作用。

我们能做的最重要的事情
就是放弃这样的观念

,即有些人的生命
比其他人的价值低

,有人
应该被强奸或谋杀,

因为毕竟,他们做了什么,

他们偷了东西,或者他们做了什么
让自己入狱

的想法 发生这种事情。

这种对人类生命

的贬值,一种我们甚至对自己都几乎不承认的贬值

是导致整个
下降螺旋开始的原因。

这就是让
里约热内卢一场帮派战争中的子弹射中一个正在附近攀爬丛林健身房

的两岁女孩的头部的原因

这就是让特警队
在佐治亚州寻找冰毒贩子的原因,

他们将一枚闪光手榴弹
扔进一个小男孩的婴儿床,

在他的脸附近爆炸
并导致他终身残废。

事实是,大多数暴力事件都在错误的时间

发生
在城镇错误一侧的

人身上,其中一些
人来自

我们认为完全不同的社区。

他们中的一些
人做了可怕的事情。

但是,减少暴力首先要
尊重每个人的生命

,因为这是正确的

,而且只有将每个生命都
视为至少值得正当程序,

我们才能创建
无辜者生命安全的社会。

其次,认识到今天,

我们国家

内部的不平等是
比国家间战争更大的暴力原因。

现在,不平等导致
暴力的原因有很多,

但其中一个原因是它让我们
将自己


城镇另一边正在发生的事情分开。

我们

这些受益于这些系统的中产阶级或富人,

不得不
以巨大的代价来改变它们。

我们必须缴纳足够的税款

,然后要求我们的政府
在其他孩子的学校配备优秀的教师

和训练有素的警察
来保护其他人的社区。

但是,当然,

如果政府在偷钱
或助长暴力,这不会有任何好处

,因此我们还需要更好的政治家
和更好的激励措施。

事实是,我们实际上非常
了解如何减少暴力。

它的政策就像


暴力发生最多的少数地方部署更多警察。

但他们不容易融入
左派或右派的框框

,因此您需要真正诚实的政治家

,他们愿意打破
下意识的党派偏见

并实施解决方案。

如果我们想让优秀的政治家参选,

我们就需要开始尊重政治家。

我们还可以做很多事情来打击
其他国家的特权暴力。

最暴力的政权
往往由毒品助长,

然后他们
通过

纽约和伦敦的金融系统

、房地产交易

和高端度假村洗钱。

如果您使用毒品,

从头到尾了解您的供应链,

或者承认
您愿意

为了自己的快乐而给他人带来的痛苦。

与此同时,我很想看到
其中一个旅游景点

与调查记者合作

,制作一个小小的图标——

就在免费 WiFi 旁边
,如果一个地方有游泳池,

可能会有一把小

枪 “可能是犯罪
洗钱阵线。”

(笑声)

(掌声)

但是在那之前,

如果你
在一个危险的国家预订一个地方,

无论是牙买加还是新奥尔良,

做一些网络研究,

看看你是否能发现任何犯罪关系。

而且,为了让这更容易,

支持

使我们的金融系统
更加透明的立法

——比如禁止匿名
公司所有权。

现在,这一切可能听起来
很不切实际,

有点像回收你的罐头,

只是一个巨大问题海洋中的一小滴

但这实际上是一个误解。

几个世纪以来,凶杀案一直在下降。 几十年来,

战斗死亡人数一直在
下降。


人们要求改变的地方,

暴力死亡人数有所下降,
从哥伦比亚到纽约市,自 1990 年以来,

这里的凶杀案下降了
85%。

事实是,暴力
将永远伴随着我们,

但它不是一个常数。

它已经下降了几个世纪,
而且下降得更快。

在接下来的四分之一世纪中,它会下降 25%、三分之一吗?

我们中的许多人实际上认为它可以。

我想起了所有
和他们的父亲一起长大的孩子,

所有
让他们的姐妹回来的家庭,

他们的兄弟。

它所需要的只是一个小小的推动。

它需要我们关心。

谢谢你。

(掌声)