Corporate law reform to save the world

[Music]

yes lawyers

so i’m going to talk about the superhero

we need

now michael stipe from rem tells us that

it’s the end

of the world as we know it but tina

turner

she tells us we don’t need another hero

well if it’s the end of the world as we

know it and you don’t

feel fine about that then maybe we do

need

another hero perhaps even a superhero

look certainly there are things that

aren’t looking too flash at the moment

there’s plastic in the food chain

soon there’ll be more plastic in the

oceans than there is fish

in the oceans we may only have 60 or so

harvests left because of the degradation

of the soil we’ve got obesity leading on

to diabetes leading on to

dementia earth overshoot day

the day when we use up the resources

that the earth

sustainably provides to us is currently

the 29th of july each year

and you may have noticed the climate is

changing

stephen emmett in his book and film

10 billion sums it up this way

humans take so much of the earth’s

resources

they’re growing towards a population of

10 billion

he says we urgently need to do and i

mean

actually do something radical

to avert a global catastrophe

now steven’s from yorkshire where the

sun shines all the time

despite which he doesn’t have a glass

half full approach to this the full

quote continues

but i don’t think we will i think we’re

[ __ ]

well if we want to take a glass

half full and problem solving approach

to it

first of all we’ve got to look more

closely at the problem

i do slightly disagree with professor

emmett

because when you see the impoverished

circumstances of the majority

of the world’s population who don’t take

more resources

than is due to them you see that the

problem is not

the entirety of the world the problem is

the rich part of the world

including out your own so what is it

about this part of the world the rich

part of the world

that is different from the rest and one

key

difference is that we run our societies

through corporations or companies

now they of course have done great

things they accumulate capital which

allow big projects to be done

they have driven the growth in living

standards from which we all benefit

but they also have a important

flaw to note in current times

effectively they’re psychopaths

milton friedman the guru of

neoliberalism

wrote an important article back in 1970

when he said the only social

responsibility of businesses

is to maximize their profits to increase

and maximize profits

flip side of this which has been pointed

out by the

corporate law scholar joel bakken

is that corporations are programmed

to exploit others for profit and they’re

also

programmed to exploit natural resources

and programmed is the important word

we have created companies and we’ve set

the rules for them we’ve programmed them

and what we’ve programmed them to do at

the moment

is to act in the best interests of

shareholders and what that has been

interpreted to mean

is maximize the profits

that go to shareholders and that of

course

means that companies can only do

socially responsible things if they

calculate that that will earn them more

money

in other words we require corporations

to do

rational but psychopathic things

they have to externalize costs

they have to minimize taxes

they have to persuade us to buy stuff

and more stuff and new stuff and

replacement stuff

it’s their job because that’s how we’ve

programmed them

so let’s recap it’s the end of the world

as we know it

and our lives are dominated by hannibal

lecter

so i’m sorry tina turner we do need

another hero and in fact we need a

superhero

but what sort of superhero

the hollywood types that just chase

villains

or do we need somebody more pragmatic

somebody along the lines of monty

python’s

bicycle repairman

i think we need somebody pragmatic

because we need somebody to build on

some seeds of change that are occurring

so companies they are the product of

the legal imagination and the

programming

can change we can change the rules so

for example in the united kingdom now

instead of promoting the best interests

of the company the directors there have

to promote

the success of the company and that is

interpreted to mean

the interests of all its employees

the wider community the environment

that doesn’t necessarily go far enough

but it does demonstrate the point

that we can change the rules

so one thing we should perhaps look at

is whether we say that the core function

of companies

is to make sustainable profits

in the context of the stewardship of the

earth’s resources

point two we can make

laws including human rights laws and

environmental laws directly binding

on companies there are some examples of

this so companies now

in california in the united kingdom

in australia have to abide by modern

slavery legislation which requires them

to

find out whether there is any child

labor or slave labor

in their supply chains and if there is

to do something about it

non-discrimination law

typically that will bind companies as

well

there have been suggestions in the past

that we should make international

treaties

on human rights and environmental law

directly binding on companies

now those international treaties they

give us

a right to a sustainable environment

because without that

there will be no life traditionalists

objected to the idea that those

international norms

should be directly binding on

corporations

but we can revisit that and perhaps we

should

build on the examples so far and make

those duties more widely binding

on corporations because they are so

important

in the situation and point number three

why do we need a superhero for this

because psychopaths do not go

quietly the thing is

that we have created a massive inertia

because we have privileged corporations

in many ways

we give them human rights but we don’t

impose many obligations on them we allow

them

to fund politicians and think tanks

that speak their language we allow them

to muddy the waters both literally

and figuratively that all needs to

change

so what we need is for the activists who

can change

hearts and minds and the politicians

who can get an international consensus

to do something about corporation law

around the world it has to be

coordinated because it’s an

international problem

if we carry on with business unusual

then i’m sorry to say it soon will be

the end

of the world as we know it thank you

[音乐]

是的,律师,

所以我要谈谈我们现在需要的超级英雄

rem 的 michael stipe 告诉我们,

正如我们所知,这是世界末日,但

tina Turner

她告诉我们,

如果 正如我们

所知,这是世界末日,你对此

感到不舒服,那么也许我们确实

需要

另一个英雄,甚至是超级英雄的

样子,当然有些东西

看起来不太闪现

在食物里有塑料 链

很快

海洋中的塑料将比海洋中的鱼

还多 由于土壤退化,我们可能只剩下 60 个左右的

收成

我们已经肥胖

导致糖尿病导致

痴呆 地球超载日

我们用尽

地球

可持续提供给我们的资源的那一天是目前

每年的 7 月 29 日

,您可能已经注意到气候正在

发生变化,

斯蒂芬·埃米特在他的书和电影中

100 亿这样总结了人类消耗了

这么多 地球的

资源

他们正在向

100 亿人口增长

他说我们迫切需要做的事情 我的

意思是

实际上做一些激进的事情

来避免一场全球灾难

半满的方法完整的

报价继续,

但我认为我们不会我认为

如果我们想采取

半满的方法和解决问题的方法

首先我们必须更

仔细地观察 在这个问题上,

我确实有点不同意埃米特教授的

观点,

因为当你看到世界

上大多数人的贫困状况时,

他们并没有

获得

比他们应得的更多的资源,你会发现

问题

不是整个世界问题

是世界上富裕的部分,

包括你自己的那么

这个世界的部分是什么世界的富裕

部分

与其他地方不同,一个

关键的

区别是我们管理我们的社会

通过公司或公司,

现在他们当然做了伟大的

事情,他们积累了资本,

使大项目得以完成,

他们推动了

生活水平的提高,我们都从中受益,

但他们也有一个重要的

缺陷需要在当前

有效地注意到他们' 精神变态

者 新自由主义大师米尔顿弗里德曼

早在 1970 年就写过一篇重要文章,

当时他说企业的唯一社会

责任

是最大化他们的利润以增加

和最大化利润的

另一面,

公司法学者乔尔·巴肯(joel bakken)指出了这一点

是公司被编程

为剥削他人以获取利润,他们

也被

编程为开发自然资源

和编程是

我们创建公司的重要词,我们

为他们制定了规则,我们为他们编程

,我们编程了什么 他们目前要做的

是为股东的最佳利益行事,

而这已被

解释为 ean

是让股东获得的利润最大化

,这

当然

意味着公司只能做

对社会负责的事情,如果他们

计算出这样可以为他们赚更多的

,换句话说,我们要求

公司做

理性但精神病态的事情,

他们必须将成本外部化

必须尽量减少税收

他们必须说服我们购买

更多的东西 新的东西和

替换的东西

这是他们的工作,因为这就是我们对

它们进行编程的方式,

所以让我们回顾一下,这

是我们所知道的世界末日

,我们的生活被主宰 由汉尼拔

莱克特,

所以我很抱歉蒂娜特纳,我们确实需要

另一个英雄,事实上我们需要一个

超级英雄,

但是什么样的超级

英雄好莱坞类型只是追逐

恶棍,

或者我们需要像

巨蟒的

自行车修理工那样更务实的人

我认为我们需要一个务实的人,

因为我们需要有人在

一些正在发生的变革种子的基础上

再接再厉,所以他们是产品的公司 ct

的法律想象力和

编程

可以改变我们可以改变规则

,例如在英国,现在

不是促进公司的最大利益

,那里的董事必须

促进公司的成功,这被

解释为

意味着 所有员工

的利益 更广泛的社区

环境不一定走得足够远,

但它确实证明了

我们可以改变规则的一点,

所以我们也许应该看看的一件事

是我们是否说公司的核心功能

在地球资源管理的背景下获得可持续的利润第二

点我们可以制定

法律,包括对公司

具有直接约束力的人权法和环境法

有一些这样的例子,

所以现在

在加利福尼亚州、英国

和澳大利亚的公司必须遵守 现代

奴隶制立法要求他们

查明他们是否有任何

童工或

奴工 供应链,如果

要对此采取措施

非歧视法

通常也会约束公司

赋予

我们享有可持续环境的权利,

因为没有这一点,

就不会有生活传统主义者

反对这些

国际规范

应直接对公司具有约束力的想法,

但我们可以重新审视这一点,也许我们

应该

以迄今为止的例子为基础,制定

这些义务 对公司具有更广泛的约束力

,因为它们

在这种情况下是如此重要,第三点

为什么我们需要一个超级英雄来解决这个问题,

因为精神病患者不会

安静地离开,问题

是我们已经创造了一种巨大的惯性,

因为我们在很多方面都赋予了公司特权

给予他们人权,但我们不会

对他们施加太多义务 允许

他们资助

说他们语言的政治家和智囊团 我们允许他们

在字面上

和比喻上搅浑水,一切都需要

改变,

所以我们需要的是

能够改变

思想和思想的活动家和

能够获得国际化的政治家

在全球范围内就公司法达成共识必须进行

协调,因为这是一个

国际问题,

如果我们继续开展不寻常的业务,

那么我很遗憾地说这很快将

是我们所知道的世界末日,谢谢