Lets turn the high seas into the worlds largest nature reserve Enric Sala

If you were to jump
into any random spot in the ocean,

you would probably see
something like this.

Empty of large animals.

Because we have taken them
out of the water

faster than they can reproduce.

Today I want to propose a strategy
to save ocean life,

and the solution has
a lot to do with economics.

In 1999, a little place
called Cabo Pulmo in Mexico

was an underwater desert.

The fishermen were so upset
not having enough fish to catch

that they did something
that no one expected.

Instead of spending more time at sea,
trying to catch the few fish left,

they stopped fishing completely.

They created a national park in the sea.

A no-take marine reserve.

When we returned, 10 years later,
this is what we saw.

What had been an underwater barren

was now a kaleidoscope of life and color.

We saw it back to pristine
in only 10 years.

Including the return
of the large predators,

like the groupers, the sharks, the jacks.

And those visionary fishermen

are making much more money
now, from tourism.

Now, when we can align
economic needs with conservation,

miracles can happen.

And we have seen similar recoveries
all over the world.

I spent 20 years studying
human impacts in the ocean.

But when I saw firsthand the regeneration
of places like Cabo Pulmo,

that gave me hope.

So I decided to quit my job
as a university professor

to dedicate my life to save
more ocean places like this.

In the last 10 years, our team
at National Geographic Pristine Seas

has explored, surveyed and documented

some of the wildest places
left in the ocean

and worked with governments
to protect them.

These are all now protected, covering
a total area half the size of Canada.

(Applause)

These places are the Yellowstones
and the Serengetis of the sea.

These are places
where you jump in the water

and are immediately surrounded by sharks.

(Laughter)

And this is good,

because the sharks are a good indicator
of the health of the ecosystem.

These places are time machines

that take us to the ocean
of 1,000 years ago.

But they also show us
what the future ocean could be like.

Because the ocean has extraordinary
regenerative power,

we have seen great recovery
in just a few years.

We just need to protect
many more places at risk

so they can become wild
and full of life again.

But today, only two percent of the ocean

is fully protected from fishing
and other activities.

And that’s not enough.

Studies suggest that we need at least
30 percent of the ocean under protection

not just to save marine life,
but to save us, too.

Because the ocean gives us more than half
of the oxygen we breathe, food,

it absorbs much of the carbon pollution

that we throw in the atmosphere.

We need a healthy ocean to survive.

Now, is there a way
to accelerate ocean protection?

I think so.

And it involves us looking
at the high seas.

Now, what are the high seas?

Now coastal countries have authority
over 200 nautical miles from shore.

Everything beyond those areas
are called the high seas.

In dark blue on this map.

No country owns the high seas,

no country is responsible for them,

but they all are, so it’s a little
like the Wild West.

And there are two main types
of fishing in the high seas.

At the bottom and near the surface.

Bottom trawling is the most
destructive practice in the world.

Super trawlers, the largest
fishing vessels in the ocean,

have nets so large
that they can hold a dozen 747 jets.

These huge nets destroy
everything in their paths –

including deep corals
that grow on sea mounds,

which can be thousands of years old.

And fishing near the surface
targets mostly species

that migrate between
the high seas and country’s waters,

like tuna and sharks.

And many of these species are threatened
because of too much fishing

and bad management.

Now, who fishes in the high seas?

Until now, it was difficult
to know exactly,

because countries have been very secretive

about the long-distance fishing.

But now, satellite technology
allows us to track individual boats.

This is a game-changer.

And this is the first time

we are presenting the data
that you are going to see.

I’m going to show you
the tracks of two boats

over the course of a year,

using a satellite automated
identification system.

This is a long-liner, fishing
around the southern coast of Africa.

After a few months fishing there,
the boat goes to Japan to resupply,

and shortly after, here it is,
fishing around Madagascar.

This is a Russian trawler
fishing, probably, for cod,

in Russian waters,

and then across the high seas
of the north Atlantic.

Thanks to Global Fishing Watch,

we have been able to track
over 3,600 boats

from more than 20 countries,
fishing in the high seas.

They use satellite positioning
and machine-learning technology

to automatically identify
if a boat is just sailing or fishing,

which are the white spots here.

So with an international
group of colleagues,

we decided to investigate

not only who fishes in the high seas,
but who benefits from it.

My colleague, Juan Mayorga,

at the University of California,
Santa Barbara,

has produced detailed
maps of fishing effort,

which means how much time
and fuel is spent fishing

in every pixel in the ocean.

We have a map for every country.

China, Taiwan, Japan,
Korea and Spain alone

account for almost 80 percent
of the fishing in the high seas.

When we put all of the countries together,

this is what we get.

Because we know the identity
of every boat in the database,

we know its size, its tonnage,
the power of its engines,

how many crew are on board.

With this information, we can calculate
fuel costs, labor costs, etc.

So for the first time,

we have been able to map
the costs of fishing in the high seas.

The darker the red, the higher the costs.

Thanks to our colleagues
at the University of British Columbia,

we know how much every country
is actually fishing.

And we know the price of the fish
as it comes off the vessel.

Combined with the data on effort,

we have been able to map
the revenue of fishing the high seas.

The darker the blue,
the higher the revenue.

We have costs, and we have revenue.

So for the first time,

we have been able to map the profitability
of fishing in the high seas.

Now I’m going to show you a map.

Red colors mean we are losing money
by fishing in that part of the ocean.

Blue colors mean it’s profitable.

Here it is.

It seems mostly profitable.

But there are two more factors
we have to take into account.

First, recent investigations reveal

the use of forced labor, or slave labor,

in high seas fishing.

Companies use it to cut costs,
to generate profits.

And second, every year,
governments subsidize high seas fishing

with more than four billion dollars.

Let’s go back to the map of profits.

If we assume fair wages,

which means not slave labor,

and we remove the subsidies
from our calculation,

the map turns into this.

Fishing is truly profitable in only half
of the high seas fishing grounds.

In fact, on aggregate,

subsidies are four times
larger than the profits.

So we have five countries doing
most of the fishing in the high seas

and the economics are dependent
on huge government subsidies,

and for some countries,
on human rights violations.

What this economic analysis reveals,

is that practically the entire high seas
fishing proposition is misguided.

What sane government
would subsidize an industry

anchored in exploitation
and fundamentally destructive?

And not so profitable, anyway.

So, why don’t we close
all of the high seas to fishing?

Let’s create a giant high seas reserve,
two-thirds of the ocean.

A modeling study from –

(Applause)

A modeling study from colleagues
at UC Santa Barbara,

suggests that such reserve
would help migratory species like tuna

recover in the high seas.

And part of that increased abundance would
spill over into the countries' waters,

helping to replenish them.

That would also increase
the catch in these waters,

and so would the profits,

because the cost of fishing
would be lowered.

And the ecological benefits would be huge,

because these species of large predators,
like tuna and sharks,

are key to the health
of the entire ecosystem.

Therefore, protecting the high seas

would have ecological, economic
and social benefits.

But the truth is that most
fishing companies

don’t care about the environment.

But they would make more money
by not fishing in the high seas.

And this would not affect our ability
to feed our growing population,

because the high seas provide only
five percent of the global marine catch,

because the high seas are not
as productive as near-shore waters.

And most of the catch of the high seas
is sold as upscale food items,

like tuna sashimi or shark fin soup.

The high seas catch does not contribute
to global food security.

So how are we going to do it?

How are we going to protect the high seas?

As we speak, negotiators
at the United Nations

are beginning discussions
on a new agreement to do just that.

But this cannot happen
behind closed doors.

This is our greatest opportunity.

And we all should ensure

that our countries will support
the protection of the high seas

and get rid of subsidies
to industrial fishing.

In 2016, 24 countries
and the European Union

agreed to protect the Ross Sea,

the wildest places in Antarctica,

full of wildlife like killer whales,
leopard seals, penguins.

And this included fishing nations,
like China, Japan, Spain, Russia.

But they decided that protecting
such a unique environment

would be worth more than exploiting it
for relatively little benefit.

And this is exactly
the type of cooperation

and willingness to set aside differences

that we are going to need.

We can do it again.

If 20 years from now,

our children were to jump
into any random spot in the ocean,

what would they see?

A barren landscape,
like much of our seas today,

or an abundance of life,
our legacy to the future?

Thank you very much.

(Applause)

Thank you.

(Applause)

如果您要
跳入海洋中的任何随机位置,

您可能会看到
类似的东西。

没有大型动物。

因为我们将它们
从水中取出的

速度超过了它们的繁殖速度。

今天我想提出一个
拯救海洋生物的策略

,这个解决方案
与经济学有很大关系。

1999年,
墨西哥一个叫Cabo Pulmo的小地方

是一片水下沙漠。

渔民们因为
没有足够的鱼而感到非常沮丧,

以至于他们做了
一件没有人预料到的事情。

他们没有花更多的时间在海上,
试图捕捉剩下的几条鱼,

而是完全停止了捕鱼。

他们在海上建立了一个国家公园。

禁止捕捞的海洋保护区。

10 年后,当我们返回时,
这就是我们所看到的。

曾经的水下

荒地现在变成了生命和色彩的万花筒。

我们
只用了 10 年就看到它恢复了原始状态。

包括
大型食肉动物的回归,

如石斑鱼、鲨鱼、千斤顶。

而那些有远见的渔民

现在从旅游业赚了更多的钱

现在,当我们能够将
经济需求与保护相结合时,

奇迹就会发生。

我们在世界各地都看到了类似的复苏

我花了 20 年时间研究
人类对海洋的影响。

但是当我亲眼看到
像 Cabo Pulmo 这样的地方的复兴时,

这给了我希望。

所以我决定
辞去大学教授的工作

,献身于拯救
更多这样的海洋地方。

在过去的 10 年里,我们
国家地理原始海洋

团队探索、调查和记录了海洋中

一些最荒凉的地方

,并与政府
合作保护它们。

这些现在都受到保护,
总面积是加拿大的一半。

(掌声)

这些地方就是黄石公园
和海上的塞伦盖蒂斯。

这些是
您跳入水中

并立即被鲨鱼包围的地方。

(笑声

) 这很好,

因为鲨鱼是
生态系统健康状况的良好指标。

这些地方是时间机器

,将我们带到
一千年前的海洋。

但它们也向我们
展示了未来的海洋会是什么样子。

因为海洋具有非凡的
再生能力,

我们在短短几年内就看到了巨大的复苏

我们只需要保护
更多处于危险中的地方,

这样它们就可以再次变得狂野
和充满生机。

但今天,只有 2% 的海洋

受到完全保护,不受捕鱼
和其他活动的影响。

这还不够。

研究表明,我们需要至少
30% 的海洋受到保护,这

不仅是为了拯救海洋生物
,也是为了拯救我们自己。

因为海洋为我们
提供了我们呼吸的一半以上的氧气和食物,

它吸收

了我们排放到大气中的大部分碳污染。

我们需要健康的海洋才能生存。

现在,有没有
办法加速海洋保护?

我认同。

它涉及我们
观察公海。

现在,公海是什么?

现在沿海国家拥有
距离海岸超过 200 海里的权力。

这些区域以外的一切
都称为公海。

在这张地图上是深蓝色的。

没有国家拥有公海,

没有国家对公海负责,

但它们都是,所以有点
像狂野西部。

在公海捕鱼有两种主要
类型。

在底部和表面附近。

底拖网捕捞是世界上最具
破坏性的做法。

超级拖网渔船
是海洋中最大的渔船,

它们的网非常大
,可以容纳十几架 747 喷气式飞机。

这些巨大的网摧毁
了它们路径上的一切——

包括
生长在海丘上的深珊瑚,

这些珊瑚可能已有数千年的历史。

在地表附近捕鱼的
目标主要

是在
公海和国家水域之间迁移的物种,

如金枪鱼和鲨鱼。

由于捕捞过多

和管理不善,其中许多物种受到威胁。

现在,谁在公海捕鱼?

直到现在,还
很难确切知道,

因为各国对远距离捕捞一直非常保密

但现在,卫星技术
使我们能够追踪个别船只。

这是一个游戏规则改变者。

这是我们第一次

展示您将要看到的数据。

我将使用卫星自动识别系统向您展示一年
中两艘船的轨迹

这是一条长航线,
在非洲南部海岸附近捕鱼。

在那里捕鱼几个月后
,这艘船前往日本补给

,不久之后,它就
在马达加斯加周围捕鱼。

这是一艘俄罗斯
拖网渔船,可能是

在俄罗斯水域捕捞鳕鱼,

然后穿越
北大西洋的公海。

感谢 Global Fishing Watch,

我们已经能够追踪

来自 20 多个国家的 3,600 多艘
在公海捕鱼的船只。

他们使用卫星定位
和机器学习技术

来自动
识别一艘船是在航行还是在钓鱼,

这是这里的白点。

因此,我们与一群国际
同事一起,

决定

不仅调查谁在公海捕鱼,
还调查谁从中受益。

我在加州大学圣巴巴拉分校的同事胡安·马约加(Juan Mayorga)

制作了详细
的捕捞努力地图,

这意味着

在海洋的每个像素点上捕捞花费了多少时间和燃料。

我们有每个国家的地图。

仅中国、台湾、日本、
韩国和西班牙就


公海捕鱼量的近 80%。

当我们把所有国家放在一起时,

这就是我们得到的。

因为我们知道
数据库中每艘船的身份,

我们知道它的大小、吨位、
发动机的功率、

船上有多少船员。

有了这些信息,我们可以计算
燃料成本、人工成本等。

因此,

我们第一次能够绘制
出在公海捕鱼的成本图。

红色越深,成本越高。

感谢我们
在不列颠哥伦比亚大学的同事,

我们知道每个国家
的实际捕鱼量。

我们知道
鱼从船上下来时的价格。

结合努力数据,

我们已经能够绘制
出公海捕鱼的收入图。

蓝色越深
,收入越高。

我们有成本,我们有收入。

因此,

我们第一次能够绘制
出公海捕鱼的盈利能力图。

现在我要给你看一张地图。

红色意味着我们
在这片海域捕鱼正在赔钱。

蓝色意味着它是有利可图的。

这里是。

它似乎主要是有利可图的。

但是我们还必须考虑另外两个因素

首先,最近的调查揭示

了在公海捕鱼中使用强迫劳动或奴隶劳动

公司用它来削减成本
,创造利润。

其次,政府每年为
公海捕鱼

提供超过 40 亿美元的补贴。

让我们回到利润图。

如果我们假设工资公平,

这意味着不是奴隶劳动,

并且
我们从计算中去除补贴

,地图就会变成这样。

只有一半的公海渔场捕鱼是真正有利可图的

事实上,总的来说,

补贴是
利润的四倍。

因此,我们有五个国家
在公海进行大部分捕鱼活动

,经济依赖
于巨额政府补贴

,对一些国家来说,
依赖于侵犯人权行为。

这一经济分析揭示的

是,实际上整个公海
捕鱼的主张都是错误的。

哪个理智的政府
会补贴一个

以剥削为
基础并具有根本破坏性的行业?

无论如何,也不是那么有利可图。

那么,为什么我们不关闭
所有的公海捕鱼呢?

让我们建立一个巨大的公海保护区,
占海洋的三分之二。 来自加州大学圣巴巴拉分校的

一项模型研究

(掌声) 加州大学圣巴巴拉

分校同事的一项模型研究

表明,这样的保护区
将有助于金枪鱼等迁徙物种

在公海中恢复。

增加的丰度的一部分将
溢出到这些国家的水域,

帮助补充它们。

这也会增加
这些水域的捕捞量

,利润也会增加,

因为捕鱼成本
会降低。

生态效益将是巨大的,

因为这些大型捕食者,
如金枪鱼和鲨鱼,


整个生态系统健康的关键。

因此,保护公海

将具有生态、经济
和社会效益。

但事实是,大多数
渔业公司

并不关心环境。

但他们会通过不在公海捕鱼来赚更多的钱

这不会影响我们
养活不断增长的人口的能力,

因为公海仅提供
全球海洋捕捞量的 5%,

因为公海的
生产力不如近海水域。

大部分公海渔获
物作为高档食品出售,

如金枪鱼生鱼片或鱼翅汤。

公海渔获量无助
于全球粮食安全。

那么我们要怎么做呢?

我们将如何保护公海?

在我们发言的时候,
联合国的谈判代表们

正在开始
讨论一项新的协议来做到这一点。

但这不可能
在闭门造车的情况下发生。

这是我们最大的机会。

我们都应该

确保我们的国家
支持公海保护

,取消
对工业捕捞的补贴。

2016年,24个国家
和欧盟

同意保护罗斯海,

这是南极洲最狂野的地方,这里

有虎鲸、
豹海豹、企鹅等野生动物。

这包括渔业国家,
如中国、日本、西班牙、俄罗斯。

但他们认为,保护
这样一个独特的环境

比利用它
获得相对较少的利益更有价值。


正是我们需要的合作类型

和搁置分歧的意愿

我们可以再做一次。

如果从现在起 20 年后,

我们的孩子要
跳进海洋中的任何一个随机点,

他们会看到什么?

像我们今天的大部分海洋一样贫瘠的景观,

还是丰富的生命,
我们留给未来的遗产?

非常感谢你。

(掌声)

谢谢。

(掌声)