How architecture can create dignity for all John Cary

On a beautiful day, just a few years ago

my wife and I entered a hospital

near our home in Oakland, California

for the birth of our first daughter, Maya.

We had responsibly toured
the birthing center in advance

and yet we were somehow
still startled to find ourselves

in the place where we would experience

one of the most significant
moments of our lives.

We were stuck in a windowless room

with no hint of the bright
and sunny day that we had left.

Fluorescent lights buzzed overhead,

the paint on the walls was beige

and machines beeped inexplicably

as a wall clock indicated
day turning to night.

That clock was placed above a door

in direct line of sight

to where my wife lay as her contractions
increased hour after hour.

Now, I’ve never given birth –

(Laughter)

but she assured me that the last thing
that a birthing woman would ever want

is to watch the seconds tick by.

(Laughter)

An architect by training,
I’ve always been fascinated

watching people experience design
in the world around them.

I believe design functions
like the soundtrack

that we’re not even
fully aware is playing.

It sends us subconscious messages
about how to feel

and what to expect.

That room that we were in
seemed completely misaligned

with the moment
that we were experiencing –

welcoming a human being,

our daughter, into this world.

At one point a nurse, without any prompt,

turned to us and said,

“I always think to myself,

‘I wish I had become an architect,

because I could have designed
rooms like this better.'”

I said to her,

“An architect did design this room.”

(Laughter)

Despite the immense joy
of our daughter’s birth,

the messages of that hospital room
stick with she and I to this day.

Those messages are,

“You are not at home,

you are in a foreign place.”

“You are not in control of anything.

Not even the lighting.”

“Your comfort, simply, is secondary.”

At best,

a hospital room like this

might just be described
or dismissed as uninspiring.

At worst, it is undignifying.

And I use it to point out that none of us,

anywhere in the world,

are immune from bad design.

I went into architecture
because I believed

it was about creating spaces for people
to live their best lives.

And yet what I found
is a profession largely disconnected

from the people most directly
impacted by its work.

I believe this is because
architecture remains

a white, male, elitist profession –

seemingly unconcerned

with some of the greatest
needs in the world

or even the relatively simple needs
of an expectant mother.

Students are trained in school

using highly theoretical projects,

rarely interacting with real people
or actual communities.

Graduates are funneled
through a long, narrow

unforgiving path to licensure.

Meanwhile, the profession
holds up a select few

through relentless award programs

focused almost exclusively
on the aesthetics of buildings,

rather than the societal impact
or contributions of them.

It only goes to reinforce a warped view

of professional responsibility and success

and yet this isn’t
why so many young, hopeful people

go into architecture.

It’s not why I did.

I believed then, though I didn’t
have a language for it,

and I know now, that design
has a unique ability to dignify.

It can make people feel valued,

respected,

honored and seen.

Now I’d like for you to just think
about some of the spaces that you inhabit.

And I’d like to have you think
about how they make you feel.

Now, there are places
that make us feel unhappy,

unhealthy

or uninspiring.

They may be the places that you work

or where you heal

or even where you live.

And I ask, how might these places
be better designed with you in mind?

It’s a really simple question

and it can somehow, sometimes
be very difficult to answer.

Because we are conditioned
to feel like we don’t have much agency

over the spaces and places
that we live, work and play.

And in many cases we don’t.

But we all should.

Now, here’s a potentially dumb question
for any women watching:

Have you ever stood

in a disproportionately long
bathroom line?

(Laughter)

Did you ever think to yourself,
“What is wrong with this picture?”

Well, what if the real question is,

“What is wrong with the men
that designed these bathrooms?”

(Applause)

It may seem like a small thing,

but it’s representative
of a much more serious issue.

The contemporary world
was literally built by men

who have rarely
taken the time to understand

how people unlike them

experience their designs.

A long bathroom line
might seem like a minor indignity.

But the opposite can also be true.

Thoughtful design
can make people feel respected

and seen.

I’ve come to believe
that dignity is to design

what justice is to law

and health is to medicine.

In the simplest of terms,

it’s about having the spaces you inhabit
reflect back your value.

Over the past two years

I had the opportunity to interview
over 100 people from all walks of life

about their experience of design.

I wanted to test my hunch

that dignity and design
are uniquely related.

I listened to Gregory,

a resident of this cottage community

designed specifically

for the 50 most chronically
homeless people in Dallas.

Gregory had been living on the streets,

drifting from town to town
for over 30 years.

A broad coalition

of social service agencies,

funders and designers,

created this place.

Each 400 square foot cottage
is designed beautifully

as a permanent home.

Gregory now has a key

to a door

to his own house.

He describes the sense
of security that it brings him.

Something he had lived without
for three decades.

When he arrived with little more
than the clothes on his back,

he found everything:

from a toaster, Crock-Pot and stove

to a toothbrush and toothpaste
awaiting for him.

He describes it simply

as heaven.

On the other side of the world,

I listened to Antoinette,

the director of this
training and community center

for women in rural Rwanda.

Hundreds of women
come to this place daily –

to learn new skills,

be in community,

and continue rebuilding their lives

following the country’s civil war.

These women literally pressed

the 500,000 bricks

that make up the 17
classroom pavilions like this one.

Antoinette told me,

“Everyone is so proud of it.”

And then back here in the US

I listened to Monika,

the director of a free clinic

primarily serving
the uninsured in Arkansas.

Monika loves telling me that the doctors,

who volunteer at her free clinic

routinely tell her

that they’ve never worked
in such a beautiful, light-filled place.

Monika believes

that even people experiencing poverty

deserve quality health care.

And what’s more,

she believes they deserve
to receive that care

in a dignified setting.

People like these are invaluable
ambassadors for design

and yet they are roundly absent
from architectural discourse.

Similarly, the people who can
most benefit from good design

often have the least access to it.

Your cousin, a homeless veteran;

your grandma or grandpa

who live in a house with a kitchen
that’s no longer accessible to them;

your wheelchair-bound sister

in a suburban area
planned without sidewalks.

If good design
is only for a privileged few,

what good is it?

It’s time designers change this

by dedicating their practices
to the public good

in the model of firms

like Orkidstudio,

Studio Gang

and MASS Design Group.

Their clients

are orphaned children in Kenya,

foster children in Chicago

and pregnant women in Malawi.

Their practices are premised on the belief

that everyone deserves good design.

Dedicating more practices
to the public good

will not only create
more design that is dignifying,

but it will also
dignify the practice of design.

It will not only diversify
the client base of design,

but it will also create new,
more diverse forms of design

for the world.

Now, in order to do this,

my architecture and design friends,
especially my fellow white guys,

we must simultaneously
and significantly diversify our ranks.

If we want the public to believe
that design is for them

and for everyone.

Today, barely 15 percent

of registered architects
in the United States are women.

And a far smaller percentage
are persons of color.

Other professions, like law and medicine

had made far greater strides
in these crucial areas.

How might our shared built environment –

our homes, our hospitals,
our schools, our public spaces –

be shaped differently

if women and people of color

were behind half
of the proverbial blueprints?

It is not a question of whether,

but to what extent

our buildings, our landscapes,

our cities and our rural communities

are less beautiful, less functional,

less equitable and less dignifying

because women and people of color
are less likely to be creating them.

As Winston Churchill
famously noted in 1943

when he called for the rebuilding

of London’s war-damaged
parliamentary chambers,

“We shape our buildings,
and afterward, they shape us.”

The good news is
that we can change how we build

and who we build for.

Be that a health worker in rural Rwanda,

or a birthing mother and nervous
new father in the United States.

We can do this
by recommitting architecture

to the health, safety
and welfare of the public.

This will pay dividends.

Because once you see what design can do,

you can’t unsee it.

And once you experience dignity,

you can’t accept anything less.

Both become part of your possible.

One of my favorite conversation partners
is my 90-year-old grandmother,

Audrey Gorwitz, from Oshkosh, Wisconsin.

After one of our
conversations about design,

she wrote me a letter.

She said, “Dear Johnny,

I thought the other day,
as I sat in my doctor’s office,

how depressing it was,

from the color on the wall,
to the carpet on the floor.

(Laughter)

Now I will have to call to see

who is responsible
for the drabness in that place.”

(Laughter)

In the same letter, mind you, she said,

“I did call, and I got the man in charge,

and he said he appreciated
someone calling him.

My doctor’s office
is now on the list for an upgrade.”

(Laughter)

She signed it by saying,

“It is always good
to express one’s opinion

if done in a proper manner.”

(Laughter)

(Applause)

I love my grandma.

(Laughter)

Like my grandma Audrey,

you deserve good design.

Because well-designed spaces

are not just a matter of taste
or a questions of aesthetics.

They literally shape our ideas
about who we are in the world

and what we deserve.

That is the essence of dignity.

And both the opportunity
and the responsibility of design

for good

and for all.

Thank you.

(Applause)

在一个美好的日子,就在几年前,

我和我的妻子

为了我们的第一个女儿玛雅的出生进入了我们位于加利福尼亚州奥克兰的家附近的一家医院。

我们负责任
地提前参观了分娩中心

,但不知何故,我们
仍然惊讶地发现自己

身处在我们将体验

生命中最重要时刻之一的地方。

我们被困在一个没有窗户的房间

里,没有一丝
我们离开的阳光明媚的一天。

荧光灯在头顶嗡嗡作响,

墙壁上的油漆是米色的

,机器莫名其妙

地发出哔哔声,挂钟指示
白天变成黑夜。

那个时钟放在一扇门上方

,可以直接

看到我妻子躺着的地方,因为她的宫缩
时间一小时一小时地增加。

现在,我从来没有生过孩子——

(笑声)

但她向我
保证,一个分娩的女人最不想要的

就是看秒针的流逝。

(笑声)

作为一名受过训练的建筑师,
我一直很着迷地

看着人们
在他们周围的世界体验设计。

我相信设计功能,
比如

我们甚至没有
完全意识到的配乐正在播放。

它向我们发送
关于如何感受

和期待什么的潜意识信息。

我们所在的那个房间似乎


我们正在经历的那一刻完全不一致——

欢迎一个人,

我们的女儿,进入这个世界。

有一次,一位护士在没有任何提示的情况下

转向我们说:

“我一直在想,

‘我希望我能成为一名建筑师,

因为我本可以设计出
更好的房间。’”

我对她说,

“ 建筑师确实设计了这个房间。”

(笑声)

尽管
我们女儿的出生让我们感到无比的喜悦

,但那间病房的信息一直
伴随着她和我直到今天。

这些信息是,

“你不在家,

你在异国他乡。”

“你无法控制任何事情。

甚至连灯光也无法控制。”

“简单地说,你的舒适是次要的。”

充其量,

像这样的医院病房

可能只是被描述为
或被解雇为平淡无奇。

在最坏的情况下,它是有辱人格的。

我用它来指出,

无论在世界任何地方,我们

都不能幸免于糟糕的设计。

我进入建筑
是因为我相信

它是为人们创造空间
过上最好的生活。

然而,我
发现这个职业在很大程度上与受其工作

最直接影响的人脱节

我相信这是因为
建筑仍然

是白人、男性、精英的职业——

似乎并不关心世界

上一些最大的
需求,

甚至是孕妇的相对简单的
需求。

学生在学校接受

高度理论性项目的培训,

很少与真实的人
或实际社区互动。

毕业生
通过一条又长又窄的

无情途径获得执照。

与此同时,该行业

通过无情的奖励计划获得了少数人的支持,这些计划

几乎完全
专注于建筑的美学,

而不是它们的社会影响
或贡献。

它只会强化

对职业责任和成功的扭曲观点

,但这并不是
为什么这么多年轻、充满希望的人

进入建筑行业的原因。

这不是我这样做的原因。

那时我相信,虽然我
没有一种语言,

但我现在知道,设计
具有一种独特的尊严能力。

它可以使人们感到被重视、

尊重、

尊重和被看到。

现在我想让你
想想你居住的一些空间。

我想让你
想想他们给你的感觉。

现在,有些地方
让我们感到不快乐、

不健康

或没有灵感。

它们可能是您工作的地方、您疗伤的地方,

甚至是您居住的地方。

我问,这些地方
如何设计得更好?

这是一个非常简单的问题

,它可能以某种方式,有时
很难回答。

因为我们
习惯于觉得我们对

我们生活、工作和娱乐的空间和地方没有太多的代理权。

在很多情况下,我们没有。

但我们都应该。

现在,对于任何观看的女性来说,这可能是一个愚蠢的问题

你是否曾经

站在过长的
浴室排队中?

(笑声)

你有没有想过,
“这张照片有什么问题?”

好吧,如果真正的问题是,


设计这些浴室的人有什么问题?”

(鼓掌)

这看起来是一件小事,

但它代表
了一个更严重的问题。

当代
世界实际上是由

很少
花时间了解

与他们不同的人如何

体验他们的设计的人建造的。

一条长长的浴室线
似乎是一种轻微的侮辱。

但相反的情况也可能成立。

周到的设计
可以让人感到被尊重

和被关注。

我开始相信
,尊严就是

设计正义之于法律

,健康之于医学。

用最简单的术语来说

,就是让你居住的空间
反映你的价值。

在过去的两年里,

我有机会采访
了 100 多名来自各行各业的人,

了解他们的设计经验。

我想测试我的直觉

,即尊严和设计
是独特相关的。

我听了 Gregory 的话,

这个小屋社区的居民

是专门

为达拉斯 50 名长期
无家可归的人设计的。

格雷戈里在街上生活了 30 多年,

从一个城镇漂到另一个
城镇。

社会服务机构、

资助者和设计师的广泛联盟

创建了这个地方。

每间 400 平方英尺的小屋
都设计精美,可

作为永久居所。

格雷戈里现在有一把

通往自己家门的钥匙。

他描述
了它给他带来的安全感。

他生活
了三年没有的东西。


他只背着衣服到达时,

他发现了一切:

从烤面包机、瓦罐和炉子

到牙刷和牙膏
等着他。

他把它简单地描述

为天堂。

在世界的另一端,

我听了卢旺达农村妇女

培训和社区中心

主任安托瓦内特的讲话。 每天都有

数百名女性
来到这个地方

——学习新技能

,融入社区,

并在国家内战后继续重建她们的生活

这些妇女实际上是按

了 500,000 块砖

,构成了
像这样的 17 个教室展馆。

安托瓦内特告诉我,

“每个人都为此感到骄傲。”

然后回到美国,

我听了莫妮卡的讲话,她

是一家

主要
为阿肯色州没有保险的人服务的免费诊所的主任。

Monika 喜欢告诉我,

在她的免费诊所做志愿者的医生

经常告诉她

,他们从来没有
在如此美丽、光线充足的地方工作过。

Monika 认为

,即使是经历贫困的人也

应该得到优质的医疗保健。

更重要的是,

她认为他们应该

在有尊严的环境中接受这种照顾。

像这样的人是无价
的设计大使

,但他们却
在建筑话语中完全缺席。

同样,
最能从好的设计中受益的人

往往接触它的机会最少。

你的表弟,一个无家可归的老兵;

你的祖母或祖父

住在
他们无法再使用厨房的房子里;

你坐在轮椅上的姐姐

在一个
没有人行道的郊区。

如果好的
设计只为少数特权者服务,

那又有什么用呢?

现在是设计师改变这种状况的时候了

,他们

Orkidstudio、

Studio Gang

和 MASS Design Group 等公司的模式将他们的实践奉献给公共利益。

他们的客户

是肯尼亚的孤儿

、芝加哥的寄养儿童

和马拉维的孕妇。

他们的实践以

相信每个人都应该得到好的设计为前提。

将更多的实践奉献
给公益,

不仅会创造出
更多有尊严的设计,也

会让设计的实践更有尊严。

它不仅将使
设计的客户群多样化,

而且还将为世界创造新的、
更多样化的设计形式

现在,为了做到这一点,

我的建筑和设计朋友,
尤其是我的白人同胞,

我们必须
同时显着多样化我们的队伍。

如果我们希望公众
相信设计是为他们

和每个人设计的。

今天,在美国,只有 15%

的注册建筑师
是女性。

有色人种的比例
要小得多。

法律和医学等其他职业在这些关键领域

取得了更大的进步
。 如果女性和有色人种是众所周知的蓝图的一半,

那么我们共享的建筑环境——

我们的家、我们的医院、
我们的学校、我们的公共空间——

将如何以不同的方式塑造

这不是一个问题,

而是

我们的建筑、我们的景观、

我们的城市和我们的农村社区

在多大程度上不那么美丽、不那么实用、

不那么公平和不那么有尊严,

因为女性和有色人种
不太可能创造它们。

正如温斯顿
丘吉尔在 1943

年呼吁重建

受战争破坏的伦敦
议会厅时所说的那样,

“我们塑造了我们的建筑,
然后它们塑造了我们。”

好消息
是我们可以改变我们的建造方式

和建造对象。

无论是卢旺达农村的卫生工作者,

还是美国的分娩母亲和紧张的
新父亲。

我们可以
通过将建筑重新

致力于公众的健康、安全
和福利来做到这一点。

这将带来红利。

因为一旦你看到设计能做什么,

你就无法忽视它。

一旦你体验到尊严,

你就不能接受任何更少的东西。

两者都成为您可能的一部分。

我最喜欢的谈话伙伴之一
是我 90 岁的祖母

Audrey Gorwitz,来自威斯康星州的奥什科什。

在我们
关于设计的一次谈话之后,

她给我写了一封信。

她说:“亲爱的约翰尼,前

几天我坐在医生的办公室

里,

从墙上的颜色
到地板上的地毯,我想这是多么令人沮丧。

(笑声)

现在我得打电话给 看看


该为那个地方的单调负责。”

(笑声) 请注意,

在同一封信中,她说:

“我确实打过电话,我找到了负责人

,他说他感谢
有人给他打电话。

我的医生办公室
现在在升级名单上。”

(笑声)

她在上面签了字,

“如果以适当的
方式表达自己的意见总是好的

。”

(笑声)

(掌声)

我爱我的奶奶。

(笑声)

就像我的祖母奥黛丽一样,

你应该得到好的设计。

因为精心设计的

空间不仅仅是品味
或美学问题。

它们从字面上塑造了我们
关于我们在世界上是谁

以及我们应得什么的想法。

这就是尊严的本质。

以及为所有人
设计

的机会

和责任。

谢谢你。

(掌声)