Youre Doing it Wrong Dad

[Music]

an

old lanky farmer stood up next to me to

make his point

singling out two teenage boys in the

back of a rural west african schoolhouse

they did it the youth

the force and passion expressed by the

old farmer created tension

in what had been a seemingly pleasant

conversation

but what exactly had the youth

done if you’re like most people you tend

to think of youth as either

impressionable sponges in need of our

love knowledge and care

or as obnoxious little tears who ought

to be seen and never heard

and maybe if you’re a parent you go back

and forth between the two

but what if there were a third way to

view youth what if there were a way to

empower youth

to transform adults and what if that new

perspective of youth

could solve some of the world’s most

pressing challenges

i’m an agriculturalist i grew up on a

cattle ranch in west texas

as a product of school-based

agricultural education even serving as

national president

of the future farmers of america i never

had a desire to be in education or

youth development i wanted to transform

agriculture

particularly in sub-saharan africa a

region i had grown to appreciate

after leading several research

expeditions on agriculture and food

security

but in order to pursue this i would be

taking down a path that reshaped the way

i viewed youth

by connecting a 100 year old idea in

agricultural education

to a modern theory of behavioral

economics by a nobel prize-winning

economist

and it would all somehow collide in that

rural

west african schoolhouse which i’ll come

back to in just a moment

the story begins when america was little

more than a developing country of

struggling farmers

just over 100 years ago imagine the

scene

droves of angry farmers with pitchforks

arriving on campuses of land-grant

colleges

accusing the government of spending

their tax dollars to turn

their sons into scientists rather than

better farmers

one man rufus stimpson president of what

is today the university of connecticut

heard the legitimate concern behind the

farmer’s anger

as a pragmatist who had studied

philosophy under william james at

harvard

he believed that agricultural research

developed at the university

ought to directly benefit farmers he had

an idea

so in 1908 he resigned as college

president

to become a high school agriculture

teacher to test out his new idea

what he called a home project to diffuse

agricultural innovations

into rural communities through youth

while simultaneously giving them an

opportunity

to learn by doing the idea was

straightforward

the college trains the teacher in

science-based agricultural practices

the teacher trains the student through a

public school

and the student demonstrates the

improved methods through a home

project on their family farm when we

think of knowledge transfer

we tend to think of adults teaching

youth but this is only really true

of established knowledge and tradition

such as mathematics or even religion

it’s not necessarily true of new ideas

or technologies

such as a social media platform a social

justice cause or

even a new agricultural crop just think

of all the new technologies your own

kids have shared with you

sharing new ideas however doesn’t always

lead to behavioral shift

or adoption of new technology this is

where something in

stimson’s methodology was different his

and other youth-centered agricultural

programs

were leading to widespread adoption of

better agricultural practices

and technologies across the united

states

youth seemed to be the magic ingredient

but why

the field of behavioral economics as

developed by daniel kahneman and amos

taversky

may shed some light on this question and

present

us with an opportunity to shift the way

we think of the role of youth in the

economy

to better illustrate this let’s have

some virtual audience participation

of the following which do you choose

take 45 cents for sure

or flip a coin and win a dollar on heads

and nothing on tails

capture that answer in your mind

second problem which you choose take

450 000 for sure or flip a coin

and win a million dollars on heads and

nothing on tails

now capture that answer in your mind

if you’re like most people you chose the

gamble of the coin flip in problem one

but chose the sure thing of the 450 000

in the second problem why the switch up

both problems share the exact same odds

in behavioral economics the answer is

reference point

reference point is simply the status quo

or in this particular case

your current state of wealth few people

know their state of wealth within a few

thousand dollars

and no one knows it within 45 cents

because a sure thing is stated as one

option

your mind adds that sure thing to your

state of wealth

and then calculates the psychological

pain it would go through

if you chose the gamble lost the gamble

and therefore lost a sure thing while

losing 45 cents may cause you no pain

losing 450 thousand dollars probably

would

that fear of loss drives you away from

the gamble in the second problem

to choose the sure thing of the 450 000

would a billionaire and a homeless

person choose the same responses to both

questions

of course not they have different

reference points

now consider this problem a new hybrid

corn seed has been introduced to a rural

community in sub-saharan africa

scientists have tested the new corn at a

research center and determined it can

double the yields of the traditional

variety

without the use of additional inputs or

change to farming practices

no community member has seen the

demonstrations and the two seeds

look identical when compared visually

let’s call the hybrid seed

a gamble and the traditional seed a sure

thing

based on reference point who is more

likely to adopt the hybrid seed

a 13 year old taking an agriculture

class in junior high school

or her father a subsistence farmer

feeding eight children at home

not only is the young person more likely

to adopt the hybrid seed

she is also the best person in that

community to share the new innovation

with adult farmers

in such a way that will lead to its

adoption

but most interventions to diffuse

agricultural innovations

focus their attention on lead farmers

rather than youth

a lead farmer tends to be more educated

and slightly better off

resulting in a reference point that

allows them to be early adopters

imagine this represents the reference

point of an average

smallholder farmer in a rural community

from their perspective

a lead farmer is already above them

producing higher yields

so when a non-profit government or

private business conducts an

agricultural intervention

with lead farmers their high yields

become even

higher but from the perspective of the

smallholder farmer

nothing really changes the status quo

stays the same

the rich keep getting richer however

from that same reference point of the

smallholder farmer

youth are perceived to be beneath them

of course someone who’s been farming for

20 years can out produce someone who’s

never

farmed before in their life so when that

same agricultural intervention

is conducted with youth

the youth outproduced the smallholder

farmer

causing the reference point to shift

the sure thing of the traditional seed

which was once perceived as a gain

is now perceived as a loss when framed

against

the youth’s performance with the gamble

of the hybrid seed

as a result most adults will choose the

hybrid seed

next time a seed that could reduce

hunger

protect the environment and lift

families out of poverty

since 2013 my organization has built

capacity for school-based agricultural

education programs

in ghana and liberia working with

organizations such as

4-h in community after community

we are meeting farmers who have improved

their yields by 50

to 150 percent and in some cases with

the right technologies

as much as 400 percent based on what

they’ve learned from

teenagers to bring greater rigor of

evidence on this

we are partnering with economists from

northwestern university

to conduct a randomized controlled trial

on the efficacy of school-based

agricultural education in liberia

this will be the first research of its

kind to actually measure the economic

impact

youth can have by framing innovations to

adults

evidence should be published by 2023

so what exactly did happen with those

youth

in that west african schoolhouse i

referred to earlier well

after that old lanky farmer startled me

with his accusation

he continued the youth taught us

previously we were slashing and burning

but the youth taught us the conservation

methods and how to use the better seed

we saw how well the school farm was

doing

so we listened farmers then went around

the room

and began telling me everything they had

learned from the school’s youth

responsible fertilizer application seed

spacing

the importance of quality seed

composting terracing

every farmer in the room had more than

doubled their yields

based on lessons learned from junior

high students

but i was still curious who specifically

taught you

i asked well ishmael taught me said one

farmer

so i asked ishmael an 18 year old

student what had happened

he said he was walking through the

village one day and overheard a group of

farmers complain

about their exceptionally low yields

he walked up to the older farmers and

confidently said

i can help you get higher yields

they hesitated at his age he told me but

accepted everything he taught

because they had seen the increased

production he had achieved

on the school farm one farmer

invited ishmael to teach him how to

avoid soil erosion

plant in rose and properly apply

fertilizer on his own farm

a two-hour lesson from a junior high

student

transformed that man’s life as the

farmer later told me

by seeing the youth excited about

agriculture and doing well

not only have i produced more food to

feed my family

it has also made me proud to be a farmer

youth play a critical and distinctive

role in the political economy of our

world

a role that only they can play because

they possess

a unique reference point and when they

are empowered with the appropriate

knowledge and technologies

they can reshape the world back to the

rest of us

to nudge us from our reference points

to make better choices to solve some of

the world’s most

challenging problems if we want a better

future

faster we must harness the unique role

of youth

but we don’t need to wait for youth to

grow up to change the world

we can empower them to change us

and the world today

you

[音乐]

一位

瘦长的老农夫站在我旁边表明

他的观点,他

西非农村的一所校舍后面

挑出

了两个十几岁的男孩,他们做到了。 看似愉快的

谈话,

如果你和大多数人一样,你

倾向于认为青春是

易受影响的海绵,需要我们的

爱知识和关怀,

或者是令人讨厌的小眼泪,

应该被看到,从不被听到

, 也许如果您是父母,您可能会在

两者之间来回走动,

但是如果有第三种

看待青年的方式呢?如果有一种方法可以

赋予青年权力

以改变成年人呢?如果这种新

的青年视角

可以解决一些问题呢? 世界上最

紧迫的挑战

我是一名农业家 我

在德克萨斯州西部的一个养牛场长大,

作为学校农业教育的产物,

甚至担任

美国未来农民的全国主席 里加 我从未想过

要从事教育或

青年发展 我想改变

农业,

特别是在撒哈拉以南非洲

地区,

在领导了几次

农业和粮食安全研究考察后,我逐渐欣赏这个地区,

但为了追求这一点,我会

通过将 100 年前的

农业教育理念

与一位诺贝尔奖得主经济学家提出的现代行为经济学理论联系起来,我走上了一条重塑我看待青年的道路

,这一切都会以某种方式在

我位于西非农村的校舍中发生碰撞。 稍后我会

回到

故事开始的时候,那时美国还

只是一个发展中国家

,100 多年前

农民苦苦挣扎

他们的税收是为了让

他们的儿子成为科学家而不是

更好的农民

一个人 rufusstimpson 世界卫生组织总裁

今天,康涅狄格大学

听到了农民愤怒背后的合理担忧,

作为一名实用主义者,他曾

在哈佛大学的威廉·詹姆斯(William James)门下学习哲学,

他认为该大学开展的农业研究

应该直接造福于农民他有

一个想法,

因此他于 1908 年辞职 作为大学

校长成为一名高中农业

教师来测试他的新

想法他称之为家庭项目通过青年将

农业创新传播

到农村社区

,同时让他们有

机会边

做边学这个想法很

简单大学培训教师 在以

科学为基础的农业实践中

,老师通过公立学校培训学生,学生

通过家庭农场的家庭项目展示改进的方法

已有的知识和传统,

例如 作为数学甚至宗教

,新想法或技术不一定是正确的,

例如社交媒体平台、社会

正义事业

甚至新农作物只要想想

你自己的

孩子与你分享的所有新技术,

分享新想法,但不会 并不总是

会导致行为转变

或采用新技术 这就是

stimson 方法的不同之处 他

和其他以青年为中心的农业

计划

正在导致美国广泛采用

更好的农业实践

和技术

青年似乎是神奇的成分

但是为什么

由 daniel kahneman 和 amos taversky 开发的行为经济学领域

可能会为这个问题

提供一些

启示,并为我们提供一个机会来改变

我们对青年在经济中的作用的看法,

以更好地说明这一点让我们有

一些虚拟的

以下观众参与你选择哪一个

肯定要45美分

或掷硬币并在正面赢得一美元,

反面没有任何东西

在您的脑海中捕捉到这个答案

第二个问题,您

选择肯定拿 450 000 或掷硬币并在正面

赢得一百万美元,反面

没有任何东西

现在捕捉到这个答案 你的想法

如果你像大多数人一样,你

在第一个问题中选择了掷硬币的赌博,但在第二个问题中

选择了 450 000 肯定的东西

为什么转换

这两个问题

在行为经济学中具有完全相同的几率答案是

参考点

参考点只是现状,

或者在这种特殊情况下,

您当前的财富状况很少有人

知道他们的财富状况在

几千美元之内,

而没有人在 45 美分之内知道它,

因为确定的事情是您心中的一种

选择

将确定的事物添加到您

的财富状态

,然后计算

如果您选择赌博会经历的心理痛苦输掉了赌博

,因此输掉了确定的事物,同时

损失了 45 美分

损失 450 000 美元可能

不会

让你感到

痛苦 不是他们有不同的

参考点

现在考虑这个问题 一种新的杂交

玉米种子已被引入

撒哈拉以南非洲的农村社区

科学家们在研究中心测试了这种新玉米,

并确定它可以

使传统品种的产量翻倍

使用额外的投入或

改变耕作方式

没有社区成员看过

演示,并且在

视觉上比较两个种子看起来相同

让我们将杂交

种子称为赌博,而传统种子则

基于参考点确定谁更有

可能采用 杂交种子

一个 13 岁

在初中上农业课的孩子

或其父亲 一个自给自足的

农民 在家养八个孩子

不仅年轻人更有

可能采用杂交种子,

她还是该

社区中与成年农民分享新创新的最佳人选

,这种方式将导致其

采用,

但大多数干预措施会扩散

农业创新

将他们的注意力集中在主要农民

而不是青年

上 主要农民往往受教育程度更高

,生活状况也稍好一些,

从而产生一个

让他们成为早期采用者

的参考点 想象这代表

了农村社区中普通小农的参考点

从他们的角度来看

,主要农民已经在他们之上

生产更高的产量,

因此当非营利性政府或

私营企业对主要农民进行

农业干预

时,他们的高产量会

变得

更高,但从小农的角度来看,

没有什么能真正改变现状

保持

不变,富人不断变得更富有,但是

来自同一个参考 小农

青年的这一点被认为低于

他们当然,一个已经耕种了

20 年的人可以生产出他们

以前从未耕种过的人,所以当对青年进行

同样的农业干预

时,

青年的产量超过了小农,

导致 改变

传统种子的确定性的参考点

,曾经被认为是一种收益

,现在被认为是一种损失,当

年轻人的表现相抗衡时,

大多数成年人

下次会选择杂交种子 自 2013 年以来,一颗可以减少饥饿的种子

保护环境并使

家庭摆脱贫困

我的组织已经在加纳和利比里亚建立了

以学校为基础的农业

教育计划的能力

4-h in community after community 等组织合作

我们会见农民 已将

其产量提高了 50

% 至 150%,并且在某些情况下使用

了正确的技术

400% 基于

他们从青少年那里学到的知识,

以提供更严格的

证据

我们正在与西北大学的经济学家合作,

对利比里亚以学校为基础的农业教育的有效性进行随机对照试验,

这将 成为同类研究中的第

一个

通过为成年人制定创新框架来实际衡量青年可能产生的经济影响的研究,

证据应该在 2023 年之前公布,

所以

我之前提到的那个西非校舍里的那些年轻人到底发生了什么

,早

在那个瘦长的老农夫之后

他的指控让我大吃一惊,

他继续说,以前年轻人教

我们砍伐和焚烧,

但年轻人教我们保护

方法以及如何使用更好的种子,

我们看到学校农场做得很好,

所以我们听了农民的意见,然后

在房间里走来走去

并开始告诉我他们

从学校的青年

责任施肥员那里学到的一切 离子种子

间距

优质种子堆肥的重要性

根据初中生的经验教训,房间里的每个农民的产量都增加了一倍以上,

但我仍然很好奇谁专门

教过你

我问得好伊什梅尔教我说一个

农民

所以我问 18 岁的

学生 ishmael 发生了什么事

他说他

有一天在村子里散步,无意中听到一群

农民

抱怨他们的产量异常低

他走到年长的农民面前

自信地说

我可以帮助你获得更高的产量

他们犹豫不决 在他这个年纪,他告诉了我,但

接受了他教的一切,

因为他们看到

在学校农场实现了增产,一位农民

邀请伊什梅尔教他如何

避免

在玫瑰中种植水土流失,并

在自己的农场正确施肥

二 一个初中生的一小时课

改变了那个人的生活,正如

农民后来告诉我的那样

,看到年轻人兴奋不已 关于

农业,做得好

不仅我生产了更多的食物来

养活我的家人,

这也让我为成为一名农民

青年

感到自豪

一个独特的参考点,当

他们获得适当的知识和技术授权时,

他们可以将世界重塑回

我们其他人

,推动我们从参考点

开始做出更好的选择,以解决

世界上一些最具

挑战性的问题,如果我们想要一个 更快更美好的

未来

我们必须发挥青年的独特

作用,

但我们不需要等待青年

长大来改变世界,

我们可以授权他们改变我们

和今天的世界